r/worldcup • u/Time-Wolf USA • 11d ago
📰News [Mark Ogden] Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) is “astonished” by FIFA’s decision to declare Folarin Balogun eligible for USA-Belgium WC R16 game on Monday, RBFA says in statement. RBFA “investigating all potential options.”
73
u/nsfgp 11d ago
Well ok don't stop there while you are at it. Not too late to give a red card now to that Paraguay 23 Galarza ... it is the right thing to do.
→ More replies (3)13
207
u/Catch-22 11d ago
FIFA has such a clean sheet, why would they tarnish their spotless reputation like this?
→ More replies (6)10
u/pessimistkonsulenten Sweden 11d ago
It really devalues the prestige of the FIFA Peace Price. Trump should be livid.
25
u/Palmerstroll Netherlands 11d ago
Turns out Gianni Infantino is even more curupt than Seb Blatter....
→ More replies (2)
74
u/Dry-University797 11d ago
And Portugal
84
u/Accomplished-Mango92 11d ago
When they came for portugal’s red card i said nothing. When they came for the us’s red card i said ):
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)17
u/Vinen 11d ago
They probably showed urrefutable evidence Messi shoukd have been red carded
11
u/National_Accident514 11d ago
Messi would have had his suspension rescinded just like Balogun.
That being said, I really don't think both deserved a red card
214
u/LanatusGG Germany 11d ago
What is The Belgian association going to do? Appeal to the organization that made the decision to suspend the suspension?
52
u/Budget-Variation-560 England 11d ago
Well it worked when Mexico and England didn't want the time of their match changed
→ More replies (27)115
u/7LineArmy USA 11d ago
Find the people responsible for suspending the suspension, and have them suspended, thus suspending their suspension of the suspension
→ More replies (6)31
338
u/Iabefmysc 11d ago
Say what you will about the red card standing or not, it’s fair for Belgium to be upset about a suspended player being reinstated the day before the match
150
u/IPissExcellentThrows USA 11d ago
It is crazy to make the ruling a day before. That shouldn't have needed days to choose whatever they did.
→ More replies (2)82
u/solojones1138 11d ago
Yeah this should have been decided within 24 hours since it was blatantly a call that VAR shouldn't have been able to review.
→ More replies (31)42
u/Grand_Strategy_Noob 11d ago
This is my take too. If rule 27 was on the table, why take 4 days to decide? The red card was Wednesday night. It's Sunday afternoon. Belgium have been preparing for a US team without Balogun and now have to shift preparations with one day's notice. I think this is ultimately the right decision but way too late. Way way too late.
→ More replies (4)26
→ More replies (43)46
u/kingchivo Mexico 11d ago
Id be abs livid if i was a belgian fan. Even with the ronaldo precedent just feels like this goes against all the fair play bs fifa preaches lol.
→ More replies (33)9
50
u/pessimistkonsulenten Sweden 11d ago edited 11d ago
According to article 9 FDC, a ref's decision on field cannot be reviewed by the FIFA judicial bodies except for obvious errors, but according to article 27 FDC, a disciplinary measure's implementation can be suspended by the judicial bodies for one to four years?
So by using article 27 FDC, the judicial bodies confirms that in their view, the red card was not an obvious error but it still decides to take such action that allows Balogun to play?
Edit. Link to the FDC: https://digitalhub.fifa.com/asset/5bd452de-0dd6-4342-93d4-53122ccb75b9/FIFA-Disciplinary-Code-2026.pdf
→ More replies (12)21
u/Ooh_look_a_butterfly 11d ago
Just to clarify 9.2 says " the FIFA judicial bodies may only review the disciplinary consequences of that decision." My understanding is the refs decision isn't reviewable under article 9, even for obvious errors, but 9.2 allows for article 27.
→ More replies (12)
56
u/Narrow_Smell1499 11d ago
You guys are giving Trump way too much credit. It’s exactly what he wanted. He always tries to take credit for something he didn’t do
→ More replies (24)
28
53
u/DeliciousUse7585 11d ago
Hang on, you’re telling me the organisation who gave Donald trump a peace prize might be corrupt?!
6
29
u/Chesneyg 11d ago
Trump has never been as popular on Reddit with Americans lmao.
11
40
u/panzermeistr Germany 11d ago
Im glad this suspension being overturned is what opened peoples eyes to FIFAs corruption.
Qatar getting to host, South America getting 3 pity matches so Saudi Arabia can host, the 2010s shitshow with the FBI, all that shit pales in comparison to this /s.
→ More replies (4)9
20
11
u/a_phantom_limb 11d ago
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has an ad hoc division set up to settle disputes during the World Cup, generally within 48 hours, though I'm not sure that Belgium will have enough time to contest the reinstatement before their match tomorrow. But even if they can get a ruling in time, CAS might just say that FIFA is within its rights under the rules to reinstate Balogun.
→ More replies (9)
59
u/that_too_ England 11d ago
all potential options
So
Option 1: put up
Option 2: shut up
→ More replies (4)
34
17
u/Soundrobe France 11d ago
Maybe that they can cancel Olise's unfair yellow card too ?
→ More replies (2)
7
43
u/_Fish_ South Korea 11d ago
The comments here from other US fans because this time it benefits us. It’s hilarious.
→ More replies (7)5
u/mangothunder1290 11d ago
As a US fan a big factor is learning the more detailed rules for the first time. The play had an injury on an unintended but arguably reckless way that did warrant a penalty but the issues around all of this is how the ref called it pre/post VAR and the rules for VAR.
VAR is newer and evolving tech for the game so rules are likely changing often and not consistent across leagues. Being host has brought a lot of new eyes to the sport from US fans where they had no old rules to compare to. Longer tenured fans could have different versions or interpretations in their heads.
At the end of the day, rules read like ref fucked up with changing the missed call on the field. Inappropriately escalated to a red and then had the next game suspension ruling suspended to attempt to unfuck the situation. The actual play and foul on the field hardly mattered in the controversy oddly enough.
→ More replies (1)
103
u/Time-Wolf USA 11d ago
Any call the referee makes tomorrow night in favor of the U.S. is going to be questioned now.
→ More replies (21)69
u/InvestIntrest 11d ago
Why? The red card was bad call so FIFA fixed that. This was the best possible outcome.
31
u/siege-eh-b 11d ago
You have to understand optics though. Call transparently reviewed and suspension overturned the day after the game? No problem. Suspension overturned the day before the game after Trump calls Infantino? Cmon now…
→ More replies (23)→ More replies (12)19
u/SpAn12 11d ago
Making a closed door decision, with no accompanying reason, and doing so having received a call from the President of the host nation... Is not the best possible outcome. It's appalling for the sport.
→ More replies (16)
46
u/amishdoinks11 11d ago
When the red card happened Reddit was talking about how dumb it was and it should be revoked but now that it’s revoked everyone is claiming corruption and US bribing?
9
u/christopher_mtrl 11d ago
It doesn't really matter if the red was desserved or not. Wrong ref decision happen all the time, all teams live with them. What matters here is that, per NYTimes reporting, Trump called FIFA head to get the decision reversed and got want he wanted. This basically never happens during a tournament, and now casts a shadow of corrumption and favoritism for some teams instead of a level field.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (26)18
u/SeniorDisplay1820 11d ago
The issue is that it wasn't revoked, it was suspended for a year.
So FIFA seemingly think 2 contradictory things a) that it was worthy of a red card and b) that it was not enough of a red card to warrant the normal suspension.
Those two things together don't make sense. It's either a red card or it isn't.
→ More replies (5)7
u/throwaway8943265 World Cup 11d ago
Per FIFA's own laws, red cards literally cannot be revoked after the game. FIFA's only recourse, if they believe a referee's decision was in error, is to suspend the disciplinary effects of the decision.
What ultimately caused FIFA to do this is going to be a matter of speculation - they thought the red card was wrong, or they thought the red card was right but that the VAR procedure was not properly followed, or Trump gave them a call - but they are certainly within their rights, either way.
→ More replies (3)
56
u/mishito19 11d ago
not sure why everyone WANTS red cards to be unappealable. especially considering some of the shitshow calls this tournament
→ More replies (19)
133
u/ITSHOBBSMA 11d ago
Ronaldo had a red card suspended and I don’t think people were complaining about it.
65
42
u/Agreeable_Design3337 11d ago
I’ve seen lots of people complain about fifa changing the rules to let Ronaldo play
18
u/NeteroHyouka 11d ago
They were... This is the second corrupt decision...
3
u/RudderlessRudder 11d ago
What about the other three who had red cards suspended for this tournament?
10
u/dnemonicterrier Scotland 11d ago
That's a lie loads of people complained about it, the only people who didn't where Cristiano Ronaldo fan boys.
→ More replies (1)9
u/frankievejle 11d ago
People complained about that shit when it happened. It was before the WC though.
→ More replies (36)9
29
u/Open_Enthusiasm8528 11d ago
No matter what the right decision was, the appearance of FIFA caving to the President is going to taint the results.
Also, it’s going to lead to a lot more peoples leaders publicly going after controversial calls. Fucking shitshow.
4
u/Nice_Dude 11d ago
going to taint the results
People will forget about it immediately after the game, particularly if Belgium wins
29
u/kyoto5678 11d ago
Any US win from now on will be tainted with accusations of corruption. No one can take them seriously knowing that their president can just hit up the FIFA headquarters to review decisions. Feel bad for USMNT players as they’re not to fault here but this is the price they will pay for their governments actions.
→ More replies (21)4
u/LongGhost_Gone281 11d ago
Yeah its embarrassing. FIFA though, doing FIFA things cause they got bribed by the worst smelling, shittiest President in all human history.
6
96
u/Bolts_Bama_Bucs 11d ago
Look, I’m a US soccer fan through and through, I had my opinions on the Red Card, but if our government really had a hand in overturning this decision, I don’t see how you can view this as anything but extremely corrupt.
It’s an all around weird situation to say the least and I can understand Belgium being upset that they now have to prep a new game plan with only a days notice.
7
→ More replies (17)25
u/Wafkak 11d ago
Trump thanked Fifa publicly, I don't see tha guy caring if it wasnt because of him.
18
38
u/Time-Wolf USA 11d ago
Can also see him taking credit even if he didn’t.
I don’t care either way. The suspension suspension is stupid.
→ More replies (2)26
→ More replies (3)5
16
u/brendanogo 11d ago
So nobody who got a red had to miss a game in the WC right?
→ More replies (18)9
u/faramaobscena 11d ago
It says so in FIFA rules, if you are from a country where the president has received the FIFA peace prize, you are never suspended and you get a free penalty every match.
→ More replies (1)
15
16
u/Zoostation1979 11d ago
Last three world cups have kept pushing the envelope for corruption.
I know it’s always been corrupt to a certain degree but the last three have been wild.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/Impossible_Advice449 11d ago
Still waiting on Olise yellow card getting revoked in that bs France-Paraguay game.
Just to clarify. I’m European and this is the same situation as Ronaldo. I was annoyed that he got a pass with his red card before the tournament. It’s bs
→ More replies (2)
18
u/floppymoppleson 11d ago
I can't believe the organization that gave Trump a World Peace Prize would do this.
19
u/TumbleweedFew2854 11d ago
The timing is rough for Belgium, but I don't pity them for playing the US at full strength after a suspension that was bogus initially.
→ More replies (1)
11
12
10
u/Equivalent_Beat1393 11d ago
If Balogun scores the game winning goal tomorrow night, this sub is gonna blowup
→ More replies (2)
18
u/Alderson808 11d ago
Totally fair statement and basically says “corrupt and bias” without the actual words.
Article 27 to me is kinda comical because in the end all it does is a blanket: whatever the rest of these rules say, we can decide otherwise as we see fit. Which automatically creates issues of when/why it gets used.
→ More replies (1)
19
u/Ok-Serve4645 11d ago
Now we have to wonder if the refs in the game are going to be fair too. My guess is they won’t be.
→ More replies (5)
20
u/TheEndoftheRoads 11d ago
Ya know what? I’m beginning to think these FIFA fellas aren’t on the up and up.
→ More replies (2)
20
u/TheEndoftheRoads 11d ago
At this rate, Leonel Messi is going to have to murder an Egyptian in the tunnel to get a yellow card.
→ More replies (1)
19
u/DangerousStorage1 USA 11d ago
Ronaldo has his suspension suspended so he could play in the tournament.
→ More replies (5)9
17
13
24
u/Final_Pop4821 11d ago
Regardless of who you support, FIFA needs to explain this decision clearly.
→ More replies (4)
10
u/Ok-Revolution-645 World Cup 11d ago
Someone needs to bring in the Swiss.
→ More replies (2)2
u/Ecstatic_Sand5417 USA 11d ago
Why? FIFA modeled itself after the Swiss... that's why they so corrupt
5
u/GreenBagger28 11d ago
Was the red card fully voided or just delayed suspension
→ More replies (3)10
38
u/thatboiOsaka USA 11d ago
What’s clear to me is that people saying “well now I’m rooting against the US” were always going to root against the US regardless of this decision 🤣 just be honest about it.
8
u/nst_enforcer England 11d ago
Too right. I will be eating some waffles and taking a piss in the street on match day
4
→ More replies (9)18
u/wraith313 11d ago
Ding ding ding. Yes. the people complaining already hated the US and chime in anytime they get the chance.
→ More replies (5)
10
u/Spirited_Tip_2127 11d ago
The focus here is on the wrong subject. Focus should be on HOW it got revoked.
Undue third-party / political interference under FIFA Statutes Articles 14(1)(i), 15(c), and 19(1), combined with a breach of judicial independence under the FIFA Disciplinary Code Article 32.
28
u/mamegan USA 11d ago
i’d be mad if i were a Belgium fan so i understand, it’s not about fear it’s about principle
→ More replies (9)14
u/Floridamanfishcam 11d ago
I think FIFA made the right call to suspend the red, BUT by suspending it so close to the match, they definitely hurt Belgiums preparations so that's a legitimate grievance.
→ More replies (4)
22
u/Vagabond_Tea 11d ago
Idk why people are taking sides being against American and Belgium supports. Both teams have players that love the game and just want to win, same with their supporters.
The real bad guys are FIFA. Both the initial call and the reversal are both shady. It's the people in power to blame.
→ More replies (2)
18
u/Miserable_Article664 11d ago
Please research Ronaldo’s red card suspension while you are scraping for crumbs. FIFA is consistently evil. Nothing new here
→ More replies (10)
24
u/wcaps1996 11d ago
Infantino saw another opportunity to gargle Trump’s balls and jumped at the chance. The USA and FIFA are disgusting, just made for each other.
→ More replies (10)
22
u/PuzzleheadedClue9837 Germany 11d ago
If it's true that Trump basically directly intervened to talk to Infantino, it's a disgrace. This isn't about the red card which was very questionable. Rescinding the ban is not the issue here. It's how it happened. But it's also nothing new. FIFA has been corrupt forever and it's only getting worse.
→ More replies (27)
33
u/Horror_Salamander_31 11d ago
I love how Trump is fighting for a guy who got his passport through birthright citizenship, which he tried to strike down. Balogun is only american because his mother wasn’t allowed to board a plane to fly back home to London while almost 8 months pregnant. He returned to London when he was 2 months old :)
→ More replies (28)
31
u/-1927- 11d ago edited 11d ago
It’s astonishing to me the amount of people who miss the forest for the trees by only focusing on the match and individual player
”Who cares if he gets to play? Belgium should be able to beat them anyway or they don’t deserve to be here”
”It wasn’t a red to begin with!”
”Why are people making a fuss over Folarin Balogun? Who cares?”
FIFA is allowing powerful leaders to influence their decisions. They’re allowing political pressure to decide which referee decisions should be allegable to be overturned. It’s selective, corrupt, and transparent. Would FIFA have done the same if Czech Republic had complained? If a Tunisian player got a questionable red card, would FIFA bend over backwards to make sure they could play the next game? Of course not.
Infantino is taking a sport that should belong to the people and is openly giving it away to the rich and powerful. Commercials during halfs, world cups hosted by dictatorships, unregulated pricing, and now; selective, special rules just to make sure Ronaldo and Trump are happy. FIFA can go fuck themselves. This outrage isn’t about a random red card for Balogun, it’s about the future or football
→ More replies (22)6
u/Atlas809 11d ago
Well said, another checkmark for “FIFA is the most corrupt sporting organization in the world”
56
u/TinaBurnerAccount123 USA 11d ago
Why weren’t you complaining when they did the same for Ronaldo Belgium?
45
3
u/evetSC 11d ago
They hate us so much that they are willing to turn a blind eye. I don’t see the same amount of outrage for the missed red card on Messi
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (24)13
u/There_is_no_toast 11d ago
hating the USA and wanting nothing but awful things to happen to the team is what Reddit wants.
→ More replies (10)12
u/TinaBurnerAccount123 USA 11d ago
Yup. Just a bunch of equally destructive and racist European colonial powers acting like their shit doesn’t stink. At least America knows it has problems.
→ More replies (7)
16
u/InfamousCattle3223 11d ago
Imagine if before the tournament someone said Folarin Balogun would have multiple teams up in arms about if he can play or not.
18
u/Witch_King_Malekith 11d ago
This is like a double corruption (from the ref and then fifa). Double negative is a positive I guess.
3
u/whogivesashirtdotca Canada 11d ago
Triple corruption: Trump was the one telling Infantino to drop it. You're back to negative.
18
11
u/chipkeymouse USA 11d ago
All of this would be avoided if they did the sensible thing and kept appeals. It's not like they didn't see something like this coming.
38
u/Hobowan42 11d ago
Let's say it was a bad call, continental and international football all around the world every week is full of bad calls, but practically NEVER is a ban overturned.
Its unheard of only in the most grave of circumstances, like they red carded the wrong player for example.
The americans saying it's a bad call and it's the right thing to do...you need to understand to the rest of the world this is a favour that's been given to you that is almost never awarded to anyone else in far, far worse calls.
In a knockout world cup game to the wealthy cohosts.
This is a real outlier in football decision making. It's weird.
That's why it's called out as corrupt
Because it bloody is.
5
4
→ More replies (31)8
u/baconwrappedpikachu USA 11d ago
Like how they did the same exact thing for Ronaldo so he could play in the first few games he was otherwise going to be banned from?
3
u/Hobowan42 11d ago
See above, I agree with you, the Ronaldo thing was equally outrageous, just because he's Ronaldo. I shake my head.
72
u/Brilliant-Hand6445 11d ago
As a neutral fan I’m happy. Want to see both teams at full strength. The call was wrong, they fixed it.
22
u/Averylarrychristmas 11d ago
This is the part I don’t get - this isn’t a judgement call, “he said she said” issue.
It’s a black and white violation of procedure, and everyone wants it to be something it’s not.
15
u/Appropriate-Joke-806 USA 11d ago
No no no you’re wrong. A player accidentally stepping on another player’s foot in a game against Bosnia and having a replay booth make a 50/50 call means you should have to watch a game without one of the best players on the team in a tournament that happens once every 4 years and is only hosted here every 3+ decades in a deciding elimination game. Never mind no other straight red cards have been given for similar plays this World Cup.
→ More replies (2)15
u/There_is_no_toast 11d ago
Agree. No one can see past that though.
4
u/barstoolsam DR Congo 11d ago
It’s funny seeing the English or Argentina upset when 1966 & 1978 exists. Those were far far worse than a round of 32 red card decision that was frankly incorrect. If anything players should be thankful that this is the precedent going forward to protect them from shitty referring and VAR decisions that can affect future matches of teams.
34
u/IronChefPhilly 11d ago
A week ago everybody was saying it was a terrible red card so now they've corrected it it's a problem?
→ More replies (40)25
23
u/RawlsTofJ 11d ago
I thought the red card was bullshit. The way VAR was used and the inconsistencies between matches where VAR didn’t check for potential red cards (e.g. Paraguay hitting/kicking players away from play).
With that said I would like to understand the reasoning behind the decision and why this particular case has been considered. I particularly don’t like that Trump may have influenced the decision by FIFA.
→ More replies (2)3
u/jbokwxguy 11d ago
Much like how the Argentine Cape Verde game was called full time before all stoppage time elapsed, all FIFA cares about is viewership’s and revenue and the USA is well frankly a lot more lucrative. Similar to how Argentina fans show up and spend a lot of money
21
u/LifesAMitch USA 11d ago
It truly is astonishing that FIFA would do something like this. They've always been such a controversy-free org that's always on the up and up, so I get why everyone is so shocked
9
10
u/lucash7 11d ago
I mean, they did it for others, and not to mention there’s history of giving the star players passes, so not too far fetched really.
→ More replies (13)
8
u/bluecheese2040 11d ago
Lay down with dogs get fleas. This is literally about as blatant and bad example of overt corruption I've seen re football. Even Russia and Qatar didn't do this
→ More replies (6)
12
u/No_Train_9932 11d ago
It makes sense for the RBFA to be upset and challenge this. Most would. But their argument via the statement above isn’t actually addressing the reason for the decision.
5
u/Solly6788 11d ago
Thing is Fifa stated no reason for the decision... And no they also did not cancel the red card...
→ More replies (5)
23
8
5
u/TechnicalSleep7501 Uruguay 11d ago
Report it so he is not able to play until investigation complete. That is easy way for Bel.
7
u/New_Inflation_8419 11d ago
And trump has divided people as he always did. Less talk about his pedophilia
7
u/RealJoshuaJackson 11d ago
If the US wins the cup we can say this is tarnished. There’s still a very good chance they go out in the round of 16. This just isn’t the end of the world.
→ More replies (1)9
29
u/ASafeHarbor1 USA 11d ago
I can’t understate how hilarious it is, reading you guys be in shambles over the thought that Trump influenced this decision when literally 99% of you commented in the game thread about how egregious it was that he got a red.
11
u/Adventurous-Ear-1024 11d ago
One thing Reddit has taught me is that it’s truly an echo chamber. Most soccer fans on here are a vocal minority and majority of fans won’t care
→ More replies (10)10
u/EmperorPenguin1116 11d ago
Two things are true:
- It was a controversial red card
- Trump called this favour in, and no other nation would have been able to do so
→ More replies (17)
39
u/Jernbek35 USA 11d ago
VAR was incorrectly used to declare a red card on an original non called foul. The punishment was correctly suspended.
→ More replies (43)
24
17
u/DadCelo Brazil 11d ago
Good, FIFA should ALWAYS be audited by an independent third party on controversial calls.
→ More replies (5)3
u/Alderson808 11d ago
If this was a formal, routine process then absolutely agreed.
Issue is that it seems to be done so variably. Certainly examples so far skew heavily (almost exclusively) in favour of bigger teams/players
16
15
u/Bill_Sandwich 11d ago
Why are we acting like Balogun is Haaland
3
→ More replies (4)3
u/J_Dom_Squad 11d ago
The answer to that is USA lives rent free in a ridiculous amount of foreigner's heads
13
u/URokkaMyQuokka 11d ago
New York Times is just reporting that Trump called Infantino after the suspension, the inference being that he placed pressure to have the suspension removed... not a great look.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/05/us/trump-fifa-balogun-world-cup.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
→ More replies (5)
20
u/MongoBongo25 11d ago
Foodball federations should just withdraw from fifa at this point, this president makes Sepp Blatter looking like a model of honesty and integrity.
→ More replies (57)
16
u/repellediron 11d ago
Wow the organization that made up a peace prize to give to warmonger is corrupt?
FIFA has been a corrupt org for a long time
→ More replies (2)
17
16
u/Total_Put_6877 11d ago
This is so sad that FIFA has done this. Yes this is coming from an American. It’s ok to admit when something seems unethical.
Even if I don’t believe the call should have been a red to begin with, FIFA took over 3 days to come to a decision… the decision they made was not the downgrade of rescind, it was to suspend the suspension a full year.
Full transparency needs to occur in order for figure out what happened, this will never come from one of the most corrupt organizations in the world. They never are consistent and seem to let hosts and their brightest starts get away with whatever. I’m very conflicted on if I want the US to win tomorrow now. So sad it’s come to this
→ More replies (18)4
u/XbxH1ghBEaM 11d ago
If you are a US fan, why wouldn't you want the US to win tmr? It's highly doubtful the players had anything to do with this. It also fucks up the Americans because of all the planning they had against Belgium that was with the forethought that Balogun wouldn't be in the match.
→ More replies (1)
10
u/theaviationhistorian Mexico 11d ago
And before people think the US government had any hand in it, AP states that the White House called Infantino regarding this red card.
→ More replies (4)3
u/voidmage898 USA 11d ago edited 11d ago
This is precisely why I've been so personally conflicted about this World Cup. I have been waiting my whole life for a competitive US national team. I want to be excited about hosting the World Cup - my wife and I even considered going to at least one game before FIFA gave Trump that made up peace prize. Trump has a way of ruining everything he gets his grubby hands on, and he does it regardless of whether he's invited in or not.
The more the US wins, the more he's going to claim the success for himself. We may never know what really happened in the phone call or the process the disciplinary committee was using to review the call. Maybe they were already discussing it when the White House made the call. Maybe they started reviewing because of the call. But it ultimately doesn't matter...the fact that the call happened calls the whole process into question. That's why a competent leader would never have done it.
I know that Team USA's successes are not Trump's success in any way, shape, or form, and I should be able to separate the two...but his own behavior makes it incredibly hard for me to do that...and that's not fair to Team USA nor anyone who plays against them. It taints each and every game.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Expert_Collar4636 11d ago
Reverse the situation De Bruyne is fouled without calls the entire first half. BOH played hardball football the entire time, crossing lines that in any other venue would have earned them yellow cards. Yet, not one was issued to manage the game and player safety. Watching the 10 seconds in the lead up to the foul, He's watching the ball, and is hit from behind well before ball arrives, by a reckless challenge for a pass that turned into a 50/50 ball. The BOH player is the person to initiate recklessness. anything after that is HIS responsibility. Parce the facts of the match entire match, including the 4-6 yellow cards that were not issued and its easy to comprehend why they ruled as they did. Belgium doesn't care about who's on the pitch. They'll bring their A game as they always do. I actually think they'd want Florian their, winning by a shit call is not really winning.
9
11d ago
[deleted]
4
u/Secret-Put4088 USA 11d ago
The sad thing, I could see either one being true. I have no trust in Infantino or the Infant.
→ More replies (1)
31
u/FTBagginz 11d ago
Ah yes, the red card that shouldn’t have been a red card handed by the worst ref in this tournament who was investigated in Brazil for match fixing, interesting you are still crying about it lmao
→ More replies (11)15
12
u/HB3187 11d ago
Some of that fifa corruption working innour favor.
But also, now we lost the built in excuse for losing
→ More replies (1)
10
10
u/constantcockgardener 11d ago
I think the red card should have been a yellow, but this reversal is also shady AF. All that being said, there should be an appeal/review process implemented IMO.
→ More replies (3)
20
u/DolphinRodeo 11d ago
Even with all the rage in this thread, nobody is claiming that they didn’t get the actual call right with the reversal. The reaction is heavily influenced by it being a country that is popular to hate on Reddit. Anybody who knows sports knows that you want it to be decided by the players, not referee error
→ More replies (8)
17
26
u/Kenevin 11d ago
Americans in this thread doing everything to prove they're just like Donald
→ More replies (43)4
29
u/bigboybigbat 11d ago edited 11d ago
For everyone that thinks it was a wrong call, are they also gonna reverse Germany’s no goal. Refs make terrible decisions all the time. Unless they reverse it in game at the moment, it stays.
America has fallen in love with its corruption being open and shameless.
Side note: it was soft as hell. But it was a red. No ball. All foot. Even if you think it was not a red, there is not enough for it to be rescinded post match.
Edit: I think my comment came across solely anti american govt. fifa is equally to blame. It’s a blatant display and act of corruption by both. FIFA has shown countless times that the money and spectacle matter more than anything to them. The White House reaching out for a referee call is par for the course for this govt. it’s sad to the world lose the least bit of pretense of decency
5
u/cacotto 11d ago
I remember being six years old playing football and being told if you hit someones ankles with the studs down you will be banned. Accident or not, its a potential career ending injury, and we see 100s of tackles a game where people dont make that mistake. You have to draw the line somewhere but FIFA decided the line isnt with potentially ruining a persons life forever.
→ More replies (29)9
u/SharkSymphony 11d ago
There is a big difference between trying to modify the outcome of a past game and trying to adjudicate things that affect future games. If you squint you might be able to see it.
→ More replies (1)
12
10
u/UndeadAnubis24 11d ago
While I don't agree with the original call, I think how red cards are handled is fine, and this special occasion seems unfair.
→ More replies (7)
8
u/qazaqstanley 11d ago
I’m not astonished. I fully expected FIFA to give us a special allowance as they love to do. It’s FIFA we’re talking about
2
u/lkn240 World Cup 11d ago
Trump is trash, FIFA is corrupt and the red card was terrible.
I'm not going to cry about a bad ref decision getting overturned. FIFA and Trump are going to suck regardless - at least an unjust suspension is gone and we get to see the best players on the field.
I don't know how anyone who saw the France/Paraguay game yesterday could defend some of the officiating in this tournament. It's WAY worse than some of the stuff that goes on in the NBA (which is wild to say)
16
u/WayOutbackBoy Norway 11d ago
Why did Belgium say nothing when Ronaldo’s red was suspended?
7
→ More replies (1)5
17
u/DanielSon602 11d ago edited 11d ago
In my opinion, the red card was a bad call that was enforced using slow motion. One in fact, both players were jockeying for position. If they want to keep the red card oh well but FIFA better review Messi’s call.
→ More replies (3)
13
u/Forest_City_Frolfer 11d ago
It was a really soft red card. It would have been really sour for the US to be down their top scorer in such a big game over such a controversial call the game before.
Now if the US loses, then there are no excuses.
→ More replies (13)3
u/he_chose_poorly 11d ago
Yeah, and it was sour when Blanc missed out on the WC final of 1998 after a controversial red against Croatia. But that's football. You deal with it. You don't send your president lobbying FIFA.
16
u/World_Mammoth 11d ago
Man, if I was a Belgian fan and wanted a visible way to protest at the game, I'd bring a big-ass homemade red card and hold it up in the stands whenever Balogun touches the ball...
→ More replies (1)
11
u/Rabbit-Hole-Quest Spain 11d ago
I guess the FIFA Peace Prize winner wanted special rules for his team.
→ More replies (3)
3
u/707Paladin 10d ago
I'm an American who wanted my team to win.
I'm not at all suited for any sort of knowledgeable or objective judgement on what constitutes a "good" red card vs a "bad" one. I follow football/soccer mostly during Olympics and World Cup periods.
I like to think the foul was more suited to a yellow than a red, but I've heard compelling arguments for the red that sound reasonable.
I'm not a fan of rules being changed like they have been, nor am I a fan AT ALL of political leaders applying pressure (real or imagined) to influence global tourneys...or any sporting events really..like this. The red card and the suspension should have stood soon as it wasnt an egregious call...which I don't believe it was.
So....while I cheer for Team USA, and wasnt thrilled at the red card, I would have preferred we not receive special attention or favorable rule changes. Had we gone all the way miraculously it would have been tainted at every step. And I 100% want my political leaders to mind their business....this was embarrassing.
This was a fun run up. But we hit a very real wall with Belgium and were outclassed at every stage of the match. We still have a lot of work to do before we can be anything but a "fun team to watch". Getting embarrassed even with this special accommodation was just icing on the cake I guess...
•
u/AutoModerator 11d ago
Thank you for your submission to r/worldcup. A general reminder to read the rules in the sidebar, treat your fellow fans with respect, and stay focused on the beautiful game.
Finally, take a closer look at this post regarding our civility rules and reddiquette because we would like for each and everyone to feel welcome on the subreddit and to keep a healthy and safe environment for the community.
Please also make sure to Join us on Discord
Thank you!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.