r/worldcup • u/goldenface4114 USA • 11d ago
š°News Folarin Balogun available for USMNT vs. Belgium as red card ban suspended
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7423410/2026/07/05/usmnt-folarin-balogun-red-card-available/Justice for Balogun!!
64
147
u/Still-Preference5464 England 11d ago
Non paywall article on this - via the athletic
Folarin Balogun will be available to play the USMNTās round of 16 match against Belgium with his one-game red-card ban suspended.
The 25-year-old received a straight red card on against Bosnia and Herzegovina for a foul on defender Tarik Muharemovic, a sanction which is automatically accompanied by a one-game suspension under Article 10.5 of FIFAās rules for the tournament.
Multiple FIFA officials told The Athleticafter the game that a team is not able to appeal against a red card or the subsequent suspension.
However, Balogun is set to be available to face Rudi Garciaās side as his suspension has been suspended.
Article 27 of FIFAās disciplinary code states that āthe judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure.ā
It adds: āIf the person benefiting from a suspended sanction commits another infringement of a similar nature and gravity during the probationary period, the suspension shall be revoked by the judicial body and the sanction enforced without prejudice to any additional sanction imposed for the new infringement.ā
Cristiano Ronaldo avoided a suspensionfor the start of the World Cup in similar circumstances after FIFA handed the Portugal captain a three-match ban, but with the final two games suspended for āa one-year probation periodā.
FIFA and U.S. Soccer have been approached for comment.
Balogun has started in all but one game for the co-hosts, scoring twice in their opener against Paraguay. The forward was subsequently rested against Turkey in the final group-stage game before returning to score against Bosnia in the first-half.
He has registered at least one goal contribution in every World Cup game he has played in so far.
Balogun was not immediately sent off after the red-card incident. The forward had reached out to position himself as he pursued a ball up the left sideline after an hour of play, landing on the back of Muharemovicās leg and raking down to his ankle.
The on-pitch referee Raphael Claus was instructed to go to the pitchside monitor to review the incident, before telling Leviās Stadium Balogun had committed a āserious foulā and would be sent off. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7423410/2026/07/05/usmnt-folarin-balogun-red-card-available/
→ More replies (10)40
675
u/ebrown38 11d ago
FIFA corruption benefitting the US?? We are officially a proper footballing country
108
u/Amockdfw89 11d ago
FIFA officially changes the name of the sport to Soccer and move their headquarters from Zurich to NYC
→ More replies (3)9
u/27bluestar USA 11d ago
Then the U.S. are allowed one hand of God play per match
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)61
396
u/Mixeygoat 11d ago
I think Messi made the call to FIFA himself. He was tired of his replay being shown as a comparison
174
u/doctortre 11d ago edited 11d ago
Call? He would have told Infantino when they woke up
→ More replies (7)36
u/SoDakZak 11d ago
I am like 1% caught up on Ronaldo/Messi/FIFA corruption lore but yall got some bangers
→ More replies (6)19
764
u/cardmanimgur 11d ago
I take back everything I said about FIFA being corrupt. Clearly this is an excellent run organization and there is nothing to see here.
→ More replies (67)122
69
u/jotama0121 11d ago
Wow I guess the FIFA peace price does carry some weight with it after all
→ More replies (2)
72
76
80
u/Sensitive-Special-14 11d ago
I think the original call was complete BS, but I also believe some back room shenanigans went on the get FIFA to reverse the call.
Don't love the sequence of how this all went down, but I'm also glad that the initial BS was called out and overturned.
→ More replies (11)10
u/DapperAgitator 11d ago
Yeah unfortunately this is just the system, it appears. There should probably be a formal review after every WC red card rather than this ad hoc decision, but happy it all took us to the fairest place.
236
u/fastmoneyboy 11d ago
Letās not forget they also lifted Ronaldoās suspension for his red card
→ More replies (70)48
u/Ok_Wealth_3433 11d ago
Huge Ronaldo fan, but Iāll agree he shouldnāt have been available for the opener
→ More replies (8)
62
u/cardmanimgur 11d ago
Probably in response to France match yesterday, like "Well if that jackass from Paraguay is allowed to play, we should probably let Balogun play too."
49
u/Mettl3Will World Cup 11d ago
The fact that no one from paraguay even got yellow is insane. I'm thinking after that, seems crazy to keep Balogun suspended for clear miscall. It's still highly irregular though.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)16
u/GripAficionado 11d ago
Yeah, that was a bit of a mess and that Paraguay didn't get a single yellow card and then he got a red for that... Not the same standard...
13
u/Huge-Boat-7457 11d ago
This is very messy regardless of if you thought the call is good or bad.
Like if you do this then how can you keep Olise yellow card and so on?
This whole trump mess is such a disaster but fifa was always full of shit.
→ More replies (1)
29
30
877
11d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
69
u/SloppyPizzaPie 11d ago
Iām curious if there is any recourse for VAR or will this just be a āwhoopsie, Iām sorry lolā
I ask somewhat out of spite, but also acknowledge the fact that this type of mess up can/does/did have a measurable impact on the game.
→ More replies (2)42
u/SothaSillies Ghana 11d ago
I think this event will make refs stick to VAR conduct rules more closely now. If they know their calls can be overturned due to breaking those rules, they'll be less likely to do it.
→ More replies (8)183
u/Acrobatic_Elk503 11d ago
And that was basically Donovanās (?) argument that this looked terrible when you slowed it down and looked at only the worst moment. When you look at the whole play, itās clear that it was not red card worth.
→ More replies (3)69
u/Mokslininkas 11d ago
Landon has been on point with his analysis this entire world cup. I really appreciate the perspective he brings to the table. Very measured and reasonable.
→ More replies (2)33
u/catsrave2 11d ago
Heās not the most colorful or entertaining of the commentary crew, but his analysis has been solid and very informative.
My partner called him āboringā which I can understand especially as a casual watcher like her, but Iāve enjoyed whenever he drills down on the more complex aspects of the game. Just needs to be a little more personable and not leave Ian hanging so often lol
→ More replies (1)15
73
u/imbored48375 11d ago
This is interesting. I hope FIFA release a statement to this effect
→ More replies (3)18
210
u/FlowAny8460 USA 11d ago
Hopefully everyone sees this lol. The original Fox Article sadly makes it seems like FIFA lifted the ban for āno reasonā
17
u/BarryMcKockinner 11d ago
Honestly, I'm still pretty shocked. This line of reasoning that "the still image was shown before the real time replay" can't really be proven. It certainly leaves room for corrupt decisions to be made but I'm of the belief that the foul should have been a yellow card anyways given the incidental nature and the way the game was being reffed prior to that foul.
→ More replies (11)9
6
u/Bat2121 11d ago
Where are you seeing this? It's not in this article.
8
u/jambox888 11d ago
OP is incorrect to say that's the reason FIFA gave, it wasn't. However it has been raised as improper.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (90)6
98
u/klitchell United States 11d ago edited 11d ago
āCristiano Ronaldo avoided a suspension for the start of the World Cup in similar circumstances after FIFA handed the Portugal captain a three-match ban, but with the final two games suspended for āa one-year probation periodā.ā
Pasting this from the article, looks like itās been done in this tournament to make sure Ronaldo could play. Corruption, yeah I guess, but evenly spread corruption, maybe š¤
→ More replies (10)
49
48
u/Nobius USA 11d ago
Relevant part of the NYT article:
However, sources with knowledge of the matter, who spoke anonymously to protect relationships, say Balogun is set to be available to face Rudi Garciaās side as his ban has been suspended.
Article 27 of FIFAās disciplinary code states that āthe judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure.ā
It adds: āIf the person benefiting from a suspended sanction commits another infringement of a similar nature and gravity during the probationary period, the suspension shall be revoked by the judicial body and the sanction enforced without prejudice to any additional sanction imposed for the new infringement.ā
→ More replies (18)
12
u/DoogTheDestroyer 11d ago
Can we link to websites that arenāt behind paywallsā¦
→ More replies (4)
13
277
u/curtisas USA 11d ago edited 11d ago
I was told on here this wasn't even possible.
Edit: were you all this upset about Ronaldo not being suspended for the first two games of the world cup too? He's the reason for this ruling. https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/cristiano-ronaldo-precedent-fifa-changing-165937388.html?guccounter=1
149
u/Fire-EyedBoy 11d ago edited 11d ago
Based on the article, it looks like CR7ās reduced suspension has set a precedent, and the ref broke VAR protocol when he awarded the red card.
→ More replies (7)61
u/plantacus 11d ago
Yhh the rulebook says "we do what we want lmaoo" It's disgusting.
→ More replies (2)42
u/Fire-EyedBoy 11d ago
I get it in most senses, but if a player earns a punishment that was unjustified, then FIFA should have the authority to reverse it. Iām not saying thatās the case with Balogunās red, but that could be the explanation.
→ More replies (10)26
u/Starmoses 11d ago
It's at best arguably a red. If he had done similar actions all game, yeah definitely no argument he deserved a red. That was his first offense and clearly unintentional. Anyone could see that.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (34)14
96
11
u/Vazteria89 11d ago
If this is possible, imagine what will happen during the game...
→ More replies (6)
9
u/No_Many1994 11d ago
USA wouldāve beaten Belarus anyway, but nice to get him back in the rotation for prep for the quarterfinals.
→ More replies (1)
28
u/Kind_Preference_6435 11d ago edited 11d ago
Just to clarify this suspension, if Balogun commits another foul in the next 12 months, does he lose the FIFA Peace Prize?
→ More replies (1)
35
u/unknown_soldier_ 11d ago
Today's reminder that this is the same FIFA that let Qatar buy a World Cup and also had a WC in Russia after they invaded and annexed Crimea
→ More replies (21)
34
u/N4llic 11d ago
This will forever reek of corruption. The rumors that Trump intervened as well and called Infantino to lift the ban just add fuel to the flames. This whole world cup seems to be drenched in suspicions. The dubious ref calls, the fixing of the rosters, the France - Paraguay referee, the forced hydration breaks when certain stadiums have closed roofs with airco while others (Seattle, have very agreable temperatures, ... It sure does seem like FIFA has an agenda.
→ More replies (5)
41
u/washheightsboy3 11d ago
Because of this, people will suspect FIFA is corrupt. /s
→ More replies (4)
118
u/SLN_05 11d ago
People are gonna hate on it cause itās America, but VAR slow motion or still images are only allowed to be used for objective facts like offsides. For something like intent or intensity, full speed is the only thing that can be used. Since slow motion was used in the issuing of Balogunās red card, it was invalid, they made the right choice in letting him play, whether you like it or not
11
u/Illustrious_Sir4041 11d ago edited 11d ago
Didnt know that part of the VAR rules.
That makes more sense than any explanation ive seen so far. The card was very harsh but defensible, surprised they would take back the suspension.
This basically never happens, even for much more obvious wrong decisions...
→ More replies (1)9
u/jdprager 11d ago
Yup. The call alone was iffy and bad, but iffy and bad cards happen all the time. That's not really grounds to overturn
A complete misuse of protocol absolutely is, and FIFA really should make it clear that's why this suspension has been revoked
→ More replies (18)38
431
u/Mcnuttey91 11d ago
Europeans sitting in no AC seething rn lmao
→ More replies (85)130
u/ExternalTangents USA 11d ago
Stewing while sipping their room temperature iceless drinks
→ More replies (11)
8
u/a_passionate_man 11d ago
Two corruption leaders finding a mutual agreementā¦who could have guessed thatā¦? š¤Ŗ
9
u/Misterarthuragain 10d ago
FIFA has been corrupt forever. This is just more proof.
→ More replies (3)
80
u/GrinningPariah Canada 11d ago
Red card was bullshit, but mostly because it was part of a larger pattern inconsistency in officiating, which this reversal is certainly not helping.
I'm in the US corner now that Canada is out, and don't get me wrong I'm glad to have Balogun back. But also, FIFA, get your shit together.
→ More replies (10)
72
u/winesponioni USA 11d ago
If Balogun scores the winning goal tomorrow this sub will be in absolute shambles.
→ More replies (4)34
u/TallCan_Specialist USA 11d ago
If America beats any Belgium or any top European team this sub will be in shambles
→ More replies (9)
135
u/bungussack 11d ago edited 11d ago
The referees did not follow FIFA protocol on field, people need to understand that before crying corruption. The foul never shouldāve been flagged since nothing was given on field. Typical FIFA shit show.
→ More replies (11)39
u/Corpsebomb 11d ago
There was no way this whole thing was going to have a happy ending.
They keep the red card, we see FIFA for the bullshit organization they are.
They rescind it, we see FIFA for the bullshit organization that they are.
→ More replies (1)10
u/mightyducks2wasokay 11d ago
As long as we are all in agreement that FIFA is a bullshit organization, I think we can all be happy
28
u/Ok_Chipmunk_6059 11d ago
I applaud FIFA for managing everything wrong across this entire episode from not issuing a yellow card onward.
→ More replies (2)
28
u/TGR3326 11d ago
Donāt be mad at USMNT.
Be mad at FIFA. The red wasnāt even revoked. Just lifted the suspension. I donāt think it was a red card, but the review/appeal process needs to be fixed. Just no rhyme or reason.
→ More replies (18)
20
u/Fire-EyedBoy 11d ago edited 11d ago
Article 27 of FIFAās disciplinary code states that āthe judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure.ā
It appears that the VAR protocol was breached when Bologunās red card was given. CR7ās reduced red card suspension also appears to have set a precedent, too.
19
19
u/Emconn14 11d ago
BREAKING: FIFA memo has gone out declaring that itās officially called soccer nowĀ
17
20
19
u/ChasingMD 11d ago
Iām very conflicted. I have bitched about the implementation and usage of the new stuff for VAR for weeks. Now, FIFA quasi admits guilt but only after pressure from a host country government.
Iām happy they seemed to have rectified the red card, but it screams corruption. This whole situation is stupid
→ More replies (4)6
18
20
u/MagnesiumOvercast 11d ago
Two of the most corrupt institutions on the planet are FIFA and the Trump administration. They're calling it the most rigged tournament of all time. It's going to take some legendary bullshit to knock out France & Spain but I think they'll try.
→ More replies (2)
8
7
10
9
u/manoman42 11d ago
https://x.com/firstsquawk/status/2073872601928307197?s=46&t=M79piNuuDy83JHgGtlDoMg
TRUMP CALLED FIFA PRESIDENT INFANTINO TO REQUEST REVIEW OF BALOGUN RED CARD - SOURCE
→ More replies (3)
35
u/That-Breakfast-4805 11d ago
Little salty as a Belgian that this is coming in this late, we've likely been working on a gameplan without Balogun and this leaves very little time to pivot. And slightly worried this might indicate some favouritism that hopefully won't be evident during the match.
That said this way there won't be any bickering about unfair disadvantages for the US, and I've never much liked suspensions for red cards that are clearly accidental. And the US has probably also been training for a lack of Balogun so who knows it could even out that way.
At least now we'll see the game as it should've always been played (hopefully).
→ More replies (25)
35
u/brown-saiyan 11d ago edited 11d ago
It's shady but if Messi ain't getting reds then I'm not gonna complain too much
Go Go USA!
→ More replies (2)13
u/Sufficient_Habit5091 11d ago
This honestly. Its borderline but given it came from VAR and ref completely missed it and hard to argue it was intentional... Good call.
18
u/GentGorilla 11d ago
You know how in hollywood sports movies the bad guys always try to cheat?
→ More replies (11)
18
u/Spirited_Tip_2127 11d ago
Infantino has a major problem now. By his decision to suspend he has the following to deal with.
Undue third-party / political interference under FIFA Statutes Articles 14(1)(i), 15(c), and 19(1), combined with a breach of judicial independence under the FIFA Disciplinary Code Article 32.
Good luck getting a new term, good luck finishing the current term.
→ More replies (11)8
u/jojoalkar 11d ago
He bribes to get enough votes. Blatant corruption hasn't stopped Blatter. Nor will it stop Infantino
87
u/W359WasAnInsideJob 11d ago
For everyone complaining, how is this different than Ronaldo having his suspension revised to a probationary period so he could play in the WC?
37
→ More replies (22)35
u/nboz10 11d ago
āHow is this different from the other corruption from FIFA?ā
→ More replies (4)
32
u/SothaSillies Ghana 11d ago
RAAAAAAA BAD CALL OVERTURNED. I wish FIFA had a method for teams to appeal these cards and not leave it up to a behind-closed-doors decision, but this is a good decision on their part. That was absolutely not a red card worthy foul.
→ More replies (1)5
u/General-Eman 11d ago
Agreed the red card should be overturned but the issue is the process is behind closed doors so people donāt trust that it was done correctly
→ More replies (1)
32
u/JacboUphill 11d ago
Since seems lots of people aren't actually reading the article or the linked rule, the rule being applied to reverse this is:
"27. SUSPENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCIPLINARY MEASURES 1. The judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure."
From: https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/6094262690de769/original/FIFA-Disciplinary-Code-2025.pdf
It gives them carte blanche and doesn't appear to require justification. Could still be corruption, could still set a bad precedent, or a good one depending on your perspective, but it's not a bending of the rules it's in the rules.
→ More replies (8)
28
31
u/Ry--9 Australia 11d ago
For me, this is far beyond national pride and wanting to see your team win. US team won me over by the way they played after Balogun went off.
Not even angry at the US team or even Balogun.
Just an example of two corrupt adminstrations (Trump and FIFA) that have set a very bad predcent for the future of the tournament.
We know FIFA has been corrupt, but this is next level stuff.
What happens when another country with a fair bit of political leverage helps overturn a decision. Even one that had VAR intervention.
Not sure a smaller country would have been given the same leniency.
Sad day for the game.
→ More replies (39)
42
u/aspiring_npc Mexico 11d ago edited 11d ago
Ronaldo also got a red card ban suspended back in November during WC prelim play. He was actually suspended for 3 games, but only served 1 game suspension, Portugal's final prelim. This allowed Ronaldo to play in the WC Group stage games.
So while Balogun's situation isn't unprecedented in international play, FIFA definitely makes decisions based on their own selfish interests, rather than on principled ones.
→ More replies (5)
75
u/edward030321 11d ago
people saying this was donaldās doing forget that he would never watch soccer
31
u/Amockdfw89 11d ago
Iām actually surprised he isnāt inserting himself more into this tournament
→ More replies (7)15
8
u/BoredomHeights 11d ago
He already won FIFA Peace Bringer or whatever award so now heās moved on and wonāt look back.Ā
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)16
16
18
u/Individual-Vast6304 11d ago
FIFA has come a long way from hiding its corruption to openly displaying it š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
→ More replies (2)
69
u/boddidle 11d ago edited 11d ago
I chuckled at all the definitive "a red has never been reversed" comments last week. I don't like the precedent, but I also don't think the card was legitimate to begin with.Ā
49
u/videogamevirgin_ 11d ago
I genuinely feel like itās an excellent precedent to review red cards after a match. Itās the harshest penalty in sports, it should absolutely be confirmed by more than 1 person
→ More replies (3)18
u/Big_Liability 11d ago
Every other sport in the world reviews suspension worthy plays post game. Idk why football fans are so against this.
10
u/monoDK13 11d ago
Because then they would have to deal with the problem created by vibes based officiating at all levels of this sport. Easier to hide in tradition and corruption.
→ More replies (1)6
u/todayiwillthrowitawa 11d ago
I'm new to watching football these past four years or so but the red card stuff is among the most jarring as a new fan. Not only a game-long power play (which is match deciding in most cases) but an additional suspension seems insane (to me) for anything but headhunting and completely reprehensible play. Especially if the standard ref can issue it without any league review or signing off.
8
u/glidejanger 11d ago
The refs clearly and by rule violated VAR protocol here by what they were shown in the booth, so itās more than just a reverse of a judgement call.
→ More replies (3)14
56
u/OUTFOXEM 11d ago
Everybody crying about āFIFA corruptionā must have been in a coma for 30 years.
18
u/m0viestar 11d ago
My favorite is when this sub says FIFA never used to be in bed with corporations, as if the 1982 Coca-Cola world cup didn't exist.Ā
→ More replies (1)
32
u/DukeOfStuff_ 11d ago
Why didnāt they announce this on July 4th smhĀ
→ More replies (3)34
14
u/HotCheetoBoy 11d ago
Hey Iām new to futbol! Is FIFA know for being corrupt?
→ More replies (15)6
15
22
u/askme_if_im_a_chair USA 11d ago edited 11d ago
Maybe we can thank Paraguay for all the uncalled obviously intentional dirty behavior yesterday.
→ More replies (1)
24
u/Emconn14 11d ago
Corruption working in our favor? The US may actually be a real football country nowĀ
→ More replies (3)
18
u/Respect_Halo 11d ago
People complaining donāt know the rules. The VAR was used improperly to issue the red card. The ref went directly against the protocols of the VAR. It was very clearly not a red card.
→ More replies (13)
23
u/buttnibbler 11d ago
I was told this would never happen, only a 00.01% chance because heās not Messi level.
→ More replies (19)
25
u/fufuberry21 11d ago
Breaking: Fifa doing something that benefited the US is the first case of corruption in Fifa history.
→ More replies (1)
46
50
u/Anakins_Dad England 11d ago
Just a reminder for all saying this was done to favor the US - FIFA just did this recently for Ronaldo late last year
→ More replies (33)
142
u/SamsungStealer Canada 11d ago
Can't wait for all the people who were defending the red card to go through hoops to make this make sense.
150
u/DymonBak Argentina 11d ago
Not only defending it, but treating anyone with an opposite opinion like an idiot because the call was SO obvious. You know, despite the rules analyst on the live broadcast also disagreeing with the red card.
→ More replies (7)53
→ More replies (16)76
u/Jomosensual 11d ago
Let's be real, the majority of the people who defended the red card were ones who just want the USA to get eliminated
→ More replies (15)
37
u/WonderfulTruck5894 Netherlands 11d ago
I donāt understand the people who said it was a red card, itās one of the worst calls Iāve seen in recent years so itās justified what theyāre doing here.
→ More replies (9)6
u/DependentBudget7977 11d ago
If it's justified to alter decisions after the game, than fifa should step in and hand 3 red cards to ParaguayĀ
→ More replies (3)
15
u/Fire-EyedBoy 11d ago
So apparently itās because the decisions leading to the red was a breach in VAR protocol.
13
14
u/Rufgar 11d ago edited 11d ago
Ronaldo had a 3 game suspension āsuspendedā previous to this World Cup. This isnāt something thatās never happened before
→ More replies (7)
14
u/Patient_Tonight_9307 Canada 11d ago
I mean even if the US continues to do well their success will just be overshadowed by all this nonsense created by corruption, which stinks because theyāve been playing fantastic football
→ More replies (3)
8
u/dnemonicterrier Scotland 11d ago
What's the full story on this? Article is behind a pay wall for me.
→ More replies (1)
6
8
u/HandSack135 11d ago
Guys stop giving credit to the wrong narcissist.
Give the credit Nick Wright
→ More replies (3)
7
u/Plus-Writer-1524 11d ago
let see if French player getting a yellow for waving a finger (not the finger) get his yellow card suspended
→ More replies (3)
9
u/Logical-Breakfast150 11d ago
So can every team send their lawyers in post game to renegotiate the result?Ā
→ More replies (1)
6
7
u/Tall-Calligrapher702 11d ago
All that's left now is to make sure the Uzbek ref from the France-Paraguay game is the one for the next USA game.
21
23
u/Worried-Necessary-76 11d ago
VAR protocol was not followed properly and allowing Balogun to play confirms that an error was made. That or FIFA took a nice stack of cash.
7
24
u/dansterman_30 England 11d ago edited 11d ago
No oneās mad that one good player gets to play. Theyāre mad that itās very clear political pressure determining this decision (call from White House)
Regardless if the red was harsh or not, the ref made his call and it wasnāt without reason. It adds a standard that shows big babyās like Trump can have an impact on FIFA decision making, so who knows what else can be impacted.
If US even get close to touching the final with anymore controversy it will make it look rigged
Edit: Iām now looking forward to the euros after the clown show this World Cup has become. If any USA fans want to watch real football then tune in 2028
→ More replies (7)
24
u/pyronius 11d ago edited 11d ago
On the one hand: the original call was nonsense and should never have resulted in a red card.
On the other hand: Trump getting himself involved has utterly tainted any illusion of impartiality in the review.
On the third hand: all of these commenters acting shocked (shocked, I tell you!) that FIFA is engaging in blatant corruption are absolutely hilarious.
→ More replies (4)
82
u/Shaquille_0atmea1 11d ago
Here for all the Europeans that would rather FIFA uphold an improper application of VAR rather than amend a mistake.
→ More replies (36)
13
u/dani1304 11d ago
Big DT made the call, or maybe it was a birthday present for Americas 250
→ More replies (2)
14
13
u/Mr_Charm_School 11d ago
It's nice to know that soccer/futbol Reddit is just as toxic as NFL and NBA reddit. . .
→ More replies (3)
13
u/KellyJin17 11d ago
The team found out on social media on their way to practice, lol? Thatās insane. So FIFA had not even informed the USA before making it public.
Two things here are true: That was a bad and unwarranted call by the referee, and FIFA is as always corrupt. That red card should not have been given, but on what basis is it being reversed that the team doesnāt even know itās happening? And the team doesnāt know, but Trump already has a statement issued. Another Peace Prize-style back room gift from FIFA to our idiot president.
Maybe if FIFA employed more competent refs we could have avoided all of this.
→ More replies (1)
15
u/mclardass 11d ago
This on the heals of the zero cards for Paraguay yesterday really supports the belief that the entire tourney is one giant shit show of corruption and insiders making money at the cost of the game.
FFS, cash rules everything around me but can't we have one beautiful game without it fucking us without lube?
11
12
u/Daddy_Stop 11d ago
Not sure I've seen this happen before; I'm not as experienced as some others, but historically, I've seen many more questionable cards than this one, too. And an elected official of the host nation publicly thanking FIFA for reversing a card given to said host nation is kind of... dystopian? Maybe too strong of a word, but I'm not quite sure what to even say here...
→ More replies (4)
13
u/ExplodiaNaxos 11d ago
Justice? Justice!? I see no justice, only corruption. Wtf are you talking about
72
u/DukeOfStuff_ 11d ago
For everybody saying itās ācorruptionā this is America itās not corruption, itās lobbying.Ā
→ More replies (6)
28
27
28
u/NotACyborg666 Iran 11d ago
Infantino must be removed. He makes Sepp Blatter look like a decent man, and Blatter used to be the poster child for corruption
142
u/Unidentified-Liquid USA 11d ago
Seems like FIFA realized how bad the optics of this (questionable) call were. Issuing a red card under a blatant disregard for VAR protocol, while allowing Prince Messi to step on ankles unchecked.
Glad to see it.
BTW, where are all those droolers who were 100% confident that the suspension would not be reversed? I hope they enjoy this headline
61
u/kolinthemetz 11d ago
Also the people who were 100% confident it was a perfect red card and no one at fifa would even bat an eye at it lmao
→ More replies (17)18
u/floftie England 11d ago
I'm not sure.
The optics of it getting overturned in an unprecedented way are appalling optics as well. Getting thanked by Trump on truth social is even worse optics!
→ More replies (3)8
u/jdprager 11d ago
I kinda agree, but only because it's getting overturned in a (kinda) unprecedented way with no actual explanation. If FIFA just said "we're suspending this decision while we review the officiating process for a misuse of VAR protocol", this would be WAY less controversial. But instead they're just saying "Balogun's suspension is revoked because we have the right to revoke a suspension if we feel like it"
Like this is 100% the right decision, it just sucks that FIFA is seemingly way more willing to appear corrupt and shady than they are to put any blame on faulty officiating
→ More replies (7)
32
u/Lost-Study2885 USA 11d ago edited 11d ago
I mean, as a US fan, Iām absolutely thrilled to have Balogun back, but you have to laugh at how this went down.
The VAR official breaking protocol by showing the center ref a dramatic still image first instead of the actual real time video sequence is peak comedy. Itās the soccer equivalent of sending a heavily filtered, angles only selfie to a judge to prove a point.
Is FIFA "suspending the suspension" on a procedural technicality incredibly weird? For sure, and I totally get why fans of other teams are screaming into the void about favoritism right now. But honestly, the original red card felt way too harsh in the first place. For once, a VAR breakdown actually workedĀ inĀ our favor instead of completely screwing us over.
I'll gladly take the w. Let's go! š¦ šŗšø
→ More replies (1)
10
u/HouseHead78 11d ago
Whoah! This is a huge boost for my team but alsoā¦.uh I donāt get it
→ More replies (5)
13
5
u/Boysenberry-Secret-1 11d ago
Is this like a suspended jail sentence that celebrities and athletes get
6
6
u/J3NK505 11d ago
Apparently the White House called the FIFA president and asked home to check the red card https://apnews.com/article/falorin-balogun-suspension-world-cup-e5a5cab5731a916808601be93cb36832
6
u/JJOne101 11d ago
So.. Just imagine Uruguay having Suarez in that narrowly lost semifinal against the Dutch 2010.
6
6
21
46
u/melodypowers 11d ago
Can someone help me out. I really want to understand the timing and the ruling but I'm not that familiar with the system. Here is what I understand '
During the play of the game, Balogun stepped on Tarik Muharemovic's ankle.
The ref (Claus) did not make any call on the field.
The VAR flagged the play and told Claus to review.
Upon the review, Claus issued a red card. The red card prompts an automatic one game suspension. Under FIFA rules, the team has no ability to appeal.
FIFA determines that the 1 game suspension is adequate. While it is not overturned, nothing more is added.
This is where I am confused The USSF engaged FIFA's Disciplinary Committee. The committee determined that the VAR shouldn't have flagged the play because Claus hadnt made any call on the field. Do I have that right?
The disciplinary committee then ordered that the match suspension be suspended.
So here are my questions:
Was it appropriate for the VAR to flag the play? Is this something that typically happens in these cases?
What is the process for the USSF to engage the disciplinary committee? Is this something that other teams have done?
Did the disciplinary committee make the right call?
Also, if I'm wrong on anything here, please correct. I am asking in good faith.