r/worldcup • u/TheOldManInTheSea • 14d ago
đ°News USMNT cannot appeal Folarin Balogun red card, he could face extended World Cup ban - sources
https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49248052/usmnt-cannot-appeal-folarin-balogun-red-card-face-extended-world-cup-ban-sources95
u/twelfthcapaldi 14d ago
I think the overall problem is the inconsistencies with the refereeing this tournament. This gets a red, Messiâs challenge doesnât get anything (and I love Messi so donât get me wrong). In this game the ref didnât give out any yellows to anyone when it was warranted prior to the red. But thatâs football for you I guess, I watch the Premier League and refereeing can be a shit show there as well so nothing new.
32
u/Liiraye-Sama 14d ago edited 14d ago
Man inconsistency is the key word here. The Japan Sweden ref was actually insane. It felt like 90% of rightful fouls were completely ignored and every other non foul was called or carded. Both teams were quite mad at the refs inconsistency and blindness to the actual fouls.
I'm not making a case about the Balogun or Messis fouls cuz I didn't watch either game, just that the refs are wildly inconsistent in this WC.
6
u/twelfthcapaldi 14d ago
Yeah Iâve seen it happening in a lot of games. In France v Sweden the French defenders were full on grabbing Gyökeres and dragging him down to the ground, no fouls called. This happens to him in the Premier League as well though.
So whether you agree with Floâs red card or not, the inconsistencies with the refereeing just make it an even harder pill to swallow. Especially for casual viewers and people who are newer to watching this sport.
→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (1)8
u/xixoxixa 14d ago
I am a world-cup only soccer watcher, so bear with me, but that inconsistency is one of my biggest issues as someone who knows almost nothing else about the sport. One ref will let the players play until someone gets hurt, another ref will blow the whistle every time the wind blows the wrong way.
8
u/machine4891 14d ago
I think the overall problem is the inconsistencies with the refereeing this tournament.Â
That's the recurring problem with each and every World Cup. Since it's worldwide tournament, referees as well must represent all the contintents and some of them really are of questionable skill and quality.
It's fair to point out but US team pretending like they're the only one getting bad officiating is silly. We all been there! Now there's at least VAR which is absolutely NOT implemented correctly but it's still miles better. Should've seen what it looked like before it.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (12)7
u/DeadGoatGaming 14d ago
This is the biggest problem. Had the ref been accurately calling fouls and giving yellows to the prior instances that warranted it in the match I would have said that should be a yellow and maybe a red. But no out of nowhere red card. Like what?
108
u/GotTermitesInMahHouz 14d ago
Itâs sad weâre not focusing on celebrating the epic free kick
→ More replies (4)55
u/Automatic-Effect-252 14d ago
Itâs hard to celebrate when we have to go into the next game without our best playerÂ
→ More replies (4)20
u/DelanoK7 14d ago
Best player is quite the stretch but definitely in form, Iâll give you that
17
u/DetCityDaveST USA 14d ago
Right obviously Tim Ream is USAâs best player.
→ More replies (3)10
u/Zohren 14d ago
Pulisic is realistically the USAs best player, and McKennie is in with a shout too. Those 3 (including Balogun) are probably top 3. Actually, throw Chris Richards in there too, great defender.
→ More replies (3)
309
u/Salty_Helicopter9356 14d ago
Extending a suspension for that would be asinine.
168
u/DoubleDoobie 14d ago
They won't/wouldn't. That part is added to the headline so you click on it.
48
u/Sir_Clarence_III_Esq 14d ago
Ha ha, take that ESPN. I come to Reddit to read headlines and make comments based on my assumptions without reading the article. Your clickbait doesn't work here!
→ More replies (1)10
u/WalkingOnSunshine_ 14d ago
Thatâs just normal procedure for every red card. Very unlikely it happens
92
u/ThaRealSunGod Brazil 14d ago
This sub cannot have a good faith Convo about the USA or Messi.
Those two topics bring out the worst of the fandom
→ More replies (8)21
u/kemicalkontact 14d ago
They both deserved a red
→ More replies (1)23
u/thegoatisoldngnarly 14d ago
Both red. Both yellow. Both no card. Whatever anyone thinks, we should all at least agree the cards should be the same. It was the same foul. If anything, Messiâs was worse.
→ More replies (16)
29
u/humbuckaroo Germany 14d ago
Clickbait headline. He'll get the standard one match ban and that's it.
→ More replies (8)
143
u/Andybabez20 England 14d ago edited 14d ago
Bans are only supposed to be one game for all red card offences this tournament. It requires FIFA to step if they feel sufficient additional punishment is required, which I don't think this merits.
He'll just miss the Belgium game.
29
u/AMadHammer 14d ago
For that Qatar player who got red against Canada, he got a 5 match ban from international matches.Â
That was a wild judgment from Fifa for that case so IDK what they are doing here.Â
19
u/justforkicks28 14d ago
Another absolute bullshit ruling on FIFA. That guy never deserved a 5 game ban. This decision makes me nervous for USA
→ More replies (5)112
u/Ok_Address8167 USA 14d ago
Um, that's a pretty significant "just." Especially in a knockout situation.
We'd have no grounds for appeal, but it's not a minor loss. He was our most impactful player.
→ More replies (40)27
117
u/corobo England 14d ago
Don't ask me to explain myself or I'll hit you againÂ
- FIFAÂ
→ More replies (1)
113
u/peterpeterllini USA 14d ago
THIS JUST IN: FIFA to punish the University of Missouri with the death penalty.
38
16
u/cheesepuff1993 14d ago
Frankly, I don't know why they thought they could get away with it...better double it
6
→ More replies (4)9
u/2amthrowaway45 14d ago
Lmao I love seeing CFB references in this sub
3
u/PMURITTYBITTYTITTIES 14d ago
I was talking to a guy about the GT triple option last night in the post game thread, love the intersection
43
u/Diligent-Cat-8159 14d ago
I don't think the problem is the red card decision; it's more to do with the fact that VAR is so inconsistent. There have already been a couple of similar incidents at the World Cup so far, with the biggest one being the Messi attempted tackle, yet not a single one got a red card, let alone any card so why is Balogon being the one to get the red card when VAR is basically saying its a legal tackle in the past games
→ More replies (5)16
u/raccoonsonbicycles USA 14d ago
The main issue I have is the referees overall performance.
The red card? By letter of the law yes it is. It's tight but I get it and was never gonna anticipate an overturn.
But the referee had zero control of the game and let this happen. I'd argue the knee to the face earlier was more reckless and warranted a sending off (or at LEAST a caution). In addition to multiple very hard fouls being uncalled and uncautioned.
He absolutely caused both teams to play rougher and harder.
Doesn't excuse the recklessness but if the official had established control in the first 45, they wouldn't be playing as roughly. He allowed both teams to push from careless -> reckless-> excessive as the gsme progressed. Everyone is lucky no serious injuries occurred and careers werent impacted.
Also by letter of the law, B&H coach grabbing the ball is a team official intentionally delaying restart by holding onto the ball AND can be considered dissent given he did it specifically to shout at the official. If we play by ticky tack that should have been a red as well.
Overall a very poor overall performance. I'll allow refs to make mistakes because everyone's human and they're not omniscient but this ref just had no balls.
2 first half yellows and nothing escalates
→ More replies (1)
37
17
u/mafkJROC 14d ago
Seeing Infantino and Howard Lutnick together at the game seemed appropriate and made me want to puke.
16
189
u/itscominghomemate France 14d ago
Itâs your moment to shine, Mr President
đđđ
103
41
29
31
56
u/Feature_Minimum 14d ago
I hate that stupid cunt. But this would be HILARIOUS and honestly, fair play.
31
→ More replies (5)7
u/Cocofluffy1 14d ago
Tweet him UNFAIR! VENEZUELAN VAR CORRUPT PROBABLY SUPPORTS MADURO! STAND UP FOR AMERICA! If he can do something I guess it would be proof that even the devil can be useful occasionally.
7
u/FormalWare Canada 14d ago
If he threatens to return his FIFA Peace Prize, what can Infantino do? Checkmate.
→ More replies (11)5
u/DTKwh1terabb1t USA 14d ago
I would say don't put it past him, but the only thing he cares about is getting to be the first person to lift the trophy.
14
13
u/AlfredRWallace 14d ago
Reality is us should be able to win the next one. If the ban is more than that I'd be shocked.
38
u/shortyman920 14d ago
Additional suspension would be insane for this lol. Thatâs probably not going to happen, and weâll just have to live with the result for next game against Belgium
14
u/smittyplusplus 14d ago
Guys chill there is literally zero indication that anyone anywhere is considering extending his punishment beyond the normal red card suspension. This is clickbait BS
23
24
u/Inevitable-Scar5877 14d ago
The zoomed out replay is way worse- he gets run into from behind by the guy he lands on
9
u/Raidicus United States 14d ago
Worse, the Bosnian muscles in front of him which actually causes the collision that got him hurt. The Bosnian has every right to play for the ball, but expecting a 200-lb player to stop on a dime the very millisecond he was beaten to the ball is absurd.
→ More replies (1)
11
40
u/Dont_dreamits_over USA 14d ago
All around the world, football fans have one thing in common; support a team long enough and it will eventually get fucked over by fifa or any other applicable governing association (Iâm not talking about the red card, but an additional suspension, which I REALLY doubt would happen, but whatever.)
Next man up. Move on. Big game on the 6th.
86
u/iamatimbersfan USA 14d ago
What, exactly, would the rationale be for an extended ban? What conduct are you trying to prevent? Landing with legs extended?
18
u/Root2109 Norway 14d ago
If you read the article, it's clickbait. No one said they were considering that. They said that Fifa CAN review it and extend the ban, which they can do with any red card. No one is talking about pursuing that.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (21)19
45
u/Simply-Jason England 14d ago
As a diehard Chelsea fan who frequents other Prem teams match threads, the notion that only Americans would argue this being a true red card or not is absolutely comical.
Hell, watch any of the influencers or Youtubers that cover these games in real time and you'll see they sit there and bicker over yellow and red cards all day.
→ More replies (6)
18
u/Affectionate-Wrap-65 14d ago
Wait why would it be more than 1 match ban???
27
u/martinmix 14d ago
Just click bait. FIFA can review and extend the ban, that doesn't mean they will or have any reason to.
5
6
4
u/Background-Gas8109 14d ago
It won't be.
All straight reds are looked at to determine if the player deserves more than a 1 match ban.
9
u/Background-Gas8109 14d ago
Could face.
He won't because it wasn't intentional but they will look at it like they do all straight reds to determine if the player should be banned for more than 1 match.
10
u/CPD1960 13d ago
Simple question. Why do the Americans call their World Cup team USMNT, instead of just USA, or even US? We are not likely to confuse it with some other US sports team.
4
u/virtuous_fox 13d ago
I'm guessing it's cause our women's team is the more decorated. Generally we would do the mens team as team usa, then specify women's team, but with soccer our women's team has been top tier and our men's team under performs compared to other countries.
→ More replies (4)6
→ More replies (9)3
u/happilyfour 13d ago
Because the USWNT (US Womenâs National Team) is more reputable. You canât say the US national team or Team USA and assume youâre talking about the men when it comes to soccer over here. For other sports, weâd call our representation for whatever sport by its simple name and the assumption would be that âTeam USAâ referred to the menâs team. In this case, the womenâs team became prominent first so the USWNT (which started as a clarification that itâs the womenâs team) was more well known, and the USMNT name worked off of that.
→ More replies (13)
9
u/PinchMaNips 11d ago
I love how this is getting shoved to the top of peopleâs algorithmsâŠI donât even follow this sub
41
35
u/Volleyball45 14d ago
Iâve been in enough match day threads for the EPL and la liga to know that these non American fans are never this calm when itâs going against their club. Iâll let you know when I see a City fan calmly accept a ticky tack penalty against a critical player on their side but I wouldnât hold my breath while you wait.
→ More replies (6)11
u/One-Inflation-3524 14d ago
Exactly. If that ref called a game like that in his own country heâd be lucky to make it home to his family.
→ More replies (5)
17
u/asap_lichai 14d ago
Sources added that the VAR review is regarded as the first appeal of an incident as offenses are immediately reviewed by the match officials.
This doesn't really make sense to me. It wouldn't have been upgraded to a red card had there not been a VAR review.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/Fit-Student464 14d ago
This makes the US' job that much more difficult against a Belgoum side that just had a lucky escape.
I do not think he will get an extended ban, as it seems he went for the ball.
18
u/howdiditgetinthere USA 14d ago
Also, there was no malice. The replays clearly show him lifting his foot up as he realized he was on his opponent's foot. That was a really soft red.
→ More replies (7)
45
u/Impressive_Trust_395 14d ago
Broken leg versus perfectly fine 30 seconds later.
Yeah Iâm not sure these are equivalent
→ More replies (2)
15
u/InformationHairy3919 14d ago
Unforturtunately Balegun faces possible lifetime ban and jail time.
→ More replies (2)5
23
u/Mrl0unge 14d ago
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cvgj9e1782xo
Ronaldo and the World Cup reprieve: special treatment or justified?
Under Fifa's disciplinary code for violent conduct, Ronaldo should have received a three-match ban for elbowing Dara O'Shea during Portugal's 2-0 qualifying defeat earlier this month.
Yet Fifa's disciplinary committee said it took into account that he had not received a red card in his other 225 international appearances.
He served one match in the final qualifier against Armenia. The other two will only be activated if he "commits another infringement of a similar nature and gravity during the probationary period".
→ More replies (3)
49
u/Creative_Bat6444 14d ago
The whole talk of intent, etc. just muddies the water and isn't relevant. Neither is what has happened to other players during the tournament.
That said, the incident needs to be taken as a whole. If a player jumps for a header and an opposing player slides underneath him and gets studs in raked down his calf, does that mean the person jumping for the header should be given a red card? You can't look at the end result which is what the VAR was looking at in this case and use that footage to decide whether something is a red card.
The rule in question states that a red card should be given when "A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play."
This wasn't a tackle. It wasn't even a challenge by Balogun. The defender was challenging Balogun because he was the one how came from behind. There was no lunge and there was no excessive force applied by Balogun. He was in the air attempting to play the ball when the defender reached past him.
This should not have been a red card. Not because of intent or because of what happened to other players but because the rules don't make it a red.
The inconsistency in the calling of fouls, red cards, penalties, etc. just make the result more frustrating.
→ More replies (11)12
u/BroSoxOranje 14d ago
This is the best take Iâve heard on this subject. Thank you for a reasonable, objective interpretation quoting the rule in question and breaking it down. The last line is also a nice touch. Well done.
76
u/taco_cuisine 14d ago
People hate the US for not caring about soccer, then people hate the US for caring about soccer lmao
→ More replies (40)
36
u/chimatt767 14d ago
Just put him out there in a different uniform. No one will notice. They have no idea who the US soccer players are.
→ More replies (1)
37
6
25
u/redburn0003 14d ago
âSources added that the VAR review is regarded as the first appeal of an incident as offences are immediately reviewed by the match officials.â
BS-there was no red card given on the field prior to the VAR conspiracy
5
24
u/Nice_Pipe_7608 14d ago edited 14d ago
The Messi one didnât even go to VAR. It looks worse too because he was actually looking at the defenders feet.
→ More replies (1)7
u/red_vette 14d ago
It was also in a response to a take away, not a contested ball with two players going for it. Messi's was retaliatory and Balogun was just sloppy at worst.
45
32
36
35
u/SothaSillies Ghana 14d ago
Preventing appeals is a horrible principle. FIFA is so scared to be proven wrong, they just hope people forget about it and move on.
→ More replies (4)
6
6
u/Olaskon 13d ago
Why is the nickname for the US menâs team â mutant ninja turtlesâ?
→ More replies (1)4
u/rockne 13d ago
tMNT - the Menâs National Team
TMNT - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles→ More replies (1)
4
u/BornEvent1674 12d ago
I literally can't read anything MNT without reading it as Mutant Ninja Turtles ... United States Mutant Ninja Turtles
→ More replies (3)
18
16
18
u/wineplease09 14d ago
Can someone explain why questioning or appealing would lead to permanent ban? Sounds like some lame power trip of âyou better not question our authorityâ but I could very well be wrong.
9
u/checkonechecktwo 14d ago
Itâs two separate thoughts. There is no appeal process, also there is a chance that he could face an extended suspension (as could anyone). Theyâre just explaining the mechanisms that exist.Â
17
u/UnexpectedSharkTank 14d ago edited 11d ago
The wink, David Beckham 1998, Dejongâs tackle, Zidane headbutt, Suarez, van Persie, Totti vs South Korea, Ronaldo vs Valencia, Pepe vs Barcelona,
I think it was a valid red but one that goes uncalled all the time. The gatekeeping in here is ridiculous though. Every single one of you has overreacted to a red card for your team in the past. All of you are hypocrites.
Eat my shorts you honky fucks
→ More replies (1)
67
u/Always_Compete Portugal 14d ago edited 14d ago
Embarrassing that this clearly accidental incident may receive further suspension, while Messiâs significantly more reckless foul got not even a yellow .
Due to my flair I must add Ronaldo should have been suspended at the start of the tournament
→ More replies (3)
11
23
u/pbmadman USA 14d ago
Surely FIFA defer his suspension for a year just like they did for Ronaldo, right? Right??
21
26
u/originalusername4567 USA 14d ago
Ugh, I really hope this isn't an extended suspension. Just gotta go one game at a time, though. Poch will figure out a game plan for Belgium and Pusilic needs to step up and be the star he's been touted as.
→ More replies (1)
24
u/STL_241 14d ago
Itâs a judgement call by the ref. I donât agree with the straight red card, but the call is within the interpretation of the rules. However, any additional suspension by FIFA would be ridiculous and honestly suspect.
→ More replies (5)
30
u/CelticKnot634 USA 14d ago
Guys we got to move on. Next man up. Have people never watched sports before
6
u/zlaw32 England 14d ago
People complain about calls all the time that have far less severe consequences than this
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)18
u/Intelligent_Sky_7081 14d ago
Imagine this happened to Harry Kane. English fans would be talking about it for days. Just like they did in 2006 with wayne Rooney
We do need to move on. But it hasn't even been 24 hours yet. Id say it's understandable that people will discuss this today
→ More replies (3)
29
u/peachtree619 14d ago
My issue isnât whether if it should have been a red or not, itâs just the inconsistency of the refs. You see players make similar fouls all the time and the ref lets them just roll all over the pitch in agony and the game continues. In a sport where penalties have huge consequences there needs to be consistency.
→ More replies (6)
28
u/Mr_MacGrubber USA 14d ago
>Sources added that the VAR review is regarded as the first appeal of an incident as offences are immediately reviewed by the match officials.
That makes zero sense considering the ref didnât even call a fucking foul. It would be like an appeals court saying someoneâs guilty of murder who wasnât even charged with the crime.
→ More replies (7)
29
u/NoBreadforOldMen USA 14d ago
To my American bros, this is just how soccer works. The joy of success and the pain and disappointment of major calls that in retrospect were sus. You should have seen it before VAR. Just gotta move on
→ More replies (34)7
u/Hot_Recommendation98 14d ago
Ask Donald to trade in his FIFA peace prize for balogun to play next gameÂ
→ More replies (2)
31
u/DannyBones00 USA 14d ago
Itâs pretty telling that Europeans have gone from talking shit about the team, to talking shit about random people who are just now discovering the entire sport on Reddit.
→ More replies (60)
14
10
12
12
u/two_bagels USA 14d ago
Madibo was an example because of the injury to Kone and because he was from a country that wasnât expected to do anything in the WC. Baloguns card was already controversial so there is no way they extend his penalty. They wonât overturn it but they are not gonna extend it. In no normal cases would they do that but as others have said, because we are a host country the especially wonât.
FIFA is corruption in pursuit of money and this would be the opposite of that.
11
54
u/BassBored USA 14d ago edited 14d ago
Iâm confused. Theyâre acting like this dude punched someone in the face, it clearly was an accident why would he face an extended ban??
21
u/inbruges99 14d ago
I think the headline is a bit sensationalist. It technically can be extended but thereâs nothing to indicate it will.
18
u/sheJaMyMorant 14d ago
theyâre not going to extend it. itâs just ESPN farming outrage for clicks
35
u/YourCummyBear 14d ago
Any red card can face an extended suspension, but he wonât be suspended further.
This title is clickbait in that way. In the World Cup you cannot appeal the 1 game red card suspension but if he was to be suspended further you can appeal that suspension.
14
u/QueasySleezyCheesey USA 14d ago
It's not an extended ban, it's the standard 1 game that come with all red cards. This headline is just over-sensationalized for clicks.
It is shitty that FIFA has no protocol for overturning poor calls made by their refs, but that is it.
8
→ More replies (12)7
u/Kazuzu0098 Canada 14d ago
I think this article is just rage baiting. Its saying they can suspend him further but nothing that says they're even looking at it for additional suspension. Don't get angry at rules existing for reasons and someone pointing them out. Wait until FIFA actually says they're suspending him further.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/jeremyolar 14d ago
I dont think they'll extend the ban. If there was any intention, they may but this was a harsh one as it was a landing appraoch
9
u/infinitejester88 12d ago
Surely we can all agree that whether you think the call was right or not, the fact that you can't appeal a red card at a world cup is a terrible rule
→ More replies (10)
29
u/rock-dancer 14d ago
I donât mind some ambiguity in the rules or how intent doesnât matter. What I find objectionable is the lack of context mattering.
The context is a game that the ref let play rough with a hard play for the ball after similar incidental contact was allowed all game. The foul only really looked bad in slow motion and the player was clearly fine. We also seen similar plays receive little or no punishment except for a foul being called.
The US observer sees a player fake permanent injury and the refs buy it leading to a red card for a normal play in this game. The player hops up once the punishment is given and the other team plays with a man advantage. The rules can be stricter or looser, I just want more even application. We know much of the world hates us and canât help but be suspicious when calls like this come down after letting other, more popular players, get away with it.
→ More replies (16)
26
25
u/ComicSportsNerd 14d ago
everyone everywhere saying it's not a red card yet morons on reddit "dUh AmErIcA sTuPiD not KnOw FoOtBaLl RuLeS" this place never fails me with it's stupidity.
5
10
u/nehrkling 13d ago
As an American who played soccer in college, he got a red that was applicable. It wasn't deliberate but it was legitimate.
→ More replies (13)
25
u/_cryisfree_ 14d ago
This call was nowhere near as contentious as the call that eliminated Germany - except there seem to be around 1000 more threads about it
→ More replies (11)
25
u/Odd-Obligation-2772 14d ago
For people new to football you determine if it was a red card or not by which team he's playing for. If he's on your team, he's a completely innocent angel complete with halo and the other player should be hung drawn and quartered for getting in the way. For the other team we just skip directly to the hanging, drawing and quartering.
→ More replies (4)
21
u/Clempsoning 14d ago
these threads are pissing me off more than the red card at this point haha. People who dislike the US vs. Americans who don't like the sport arguing in circles..
20
u/No-Juggernaut8847 14d ago
Messi would get that appeal approved easily.
21
u/Suitable_Challenge_9 14d ago
Uhh, according to the refs, Messi wouldnât have to appeal anything.
17
u/Fubeman 14d ago
Funny how Ronaldoâs THREE match ban got reduced to just ONE match after he received a red card for elbowing the Irish player in the 2025 World Cup qualifier, but an appeal in this case is a no go. JFC!
4
u/MasonDinsmore3204 USA 14d ago
Wouldnât be the worst thing Ronaldo has gotten away withâŠ
→ More replies (1)
18
u/Mixeygoat 14d ago
If you all think Balogun is gonna be suspended more than one game you are delusional
→ More replies (13)
17
u/MrGoodKatt72 14d ago
If his suspension gets extended, they absolutely can appeal that. And they would certainly win that appeal.
→ More replies (1)
14
14d ago
[removed] â view removed comment
7
u/TrashbatLondon 14d ago
Intent doesnât matter. People mistakenly infer that intent is considered because the media use the term âunintentionalâ as the opposite of âdeliberateâ.
Deliberate refers to whether the movement or action is deliberate. A more accurate antithesis would be âuncontrolledâ, rather than âunintentionalâ.
So you can genuinely not intend to go through someoneâs ankle, but you can still commit a red card offence if you were in control of the body positioning that led to you going through someoneâs ankle.
The media are very unhelpful at explaining the rules sometimes.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)12
u/Waddlow 14d ago
Intent totally does matter. Anyone saying otherwise is fucking stupid. Its why Zidane's headbutt is a clear red card, but two guys headbutting each other accidentally going for the same header isn't. Intent and context always matter.
→ More replies (2)
33
u/_Diggus_Bickus_ 14d ago
Everyone here acting like it's just the USA who bitches when big calls screw them is hilarious. Yall would be doing the same exact thing if this happened to your team.
→ More replies (1)13
u/mrsfahrenheit33 14d ago
And they do. All the time lmao. Premier league fans love to protest the most imo. Iâm a Chelsea fan and canât even tell you how many times petitions have gone around to sack certain refs.
10
9
u/FeeHot5876 14d ago
If they extend it past the auto one game that would be absolutely insane
→ More replies (2)
47
u/ElGuaco 14d ago
No appeal means that a single ref can rig the outcome of the tournament. This is why people say FIFA is corrupt.
→ More replies (38)25
39
u/_Heathcliff_ 14d ago
Messi did the same thing and nobody batted an eye by the way
19
u/PatternForeign278 14d ago
Plenty of people bitched about it, what are you talking about?
→ More replies (10)9
→ More replies (9)18
44
u/FontsDeHavilland England 14d ago
Not a red card and the US are extremely unlucky.
→ More replies (31)24
u/Successful_Ask3933 14d ago
Wow a non condescending British person on a soccer sub. Hope you have a good day
→ More replies (5)
4
u/Limp-Plantain3824 13d ago
By the time this was posted the suspension was already confirmed as a single game.
Why post this then?
32
u/Smart-Protection2243 14d ago
FYI
the ref that gave the red card to Balogun was previously accused of match fixingâŠâŠ.for giving red cards in Brazils Series A in 2023.
→ More replies (11)
16
u/Man_grum 14d ago
Anyone saying dangerous play mustâve only watched the slow motion clip. In real time it was just two players tangled up and a foot incidentally lands on another players leg. No worse than any late intentional challenge where studs find a players foot or shin that weâve seen all tournament.
→ More replies (3)4
u/Big_Liability 14d ago
Itâs crazy to me this sport then auto suspends the player the next game for incidental contact that only looked bad after multiple slow motion review that wasnât even deemed bad during live play.
18
u/ActNaturally 14d ago
Im sorry... extended ban? Like theyve looked at that terrible call that was clearly without intention and want to extend his suspension?
→ More replies (13)9
u/Saint--Jiub Canada 14d ago
The Qatari player who broke Koné's leg got 5 games and that was also clearly without intention. The player even apologized to Koné in person
→ More replies (3)
17
u/leanordthefourth 14d ago
ITT - people discrediting others due to their nationality. Nice look for all of usâŠ
5
22
u/FarCalligrapher1862 14d ago
Seems off that the system was used in a manner that is against the rules, AND you cannot appeal the violation of the rule.
39
u/SlamJam64 England 14d ago
There's nothing to appeal, it's a red, and yes Messi should have got a red too
→ More replies (55)
6
u/RunnyKinePity 14d ago
Itâs done, itâs over. The ban wonât get worse. Letâs enjoy our win and hopefully make everyone take notice against Belgium. It hurts a lot but this team is still fully capable of winning a game without him.
25
u/Initial_Guess_1785 14d ago
One set of rules for Messi, another for the rest. No way FIFA is beating the charges. 7 penalties for Argentina in their last 10 games says it all
→ More replies (14)
31
u/Pleasant-Pattern7748 14d ago
The fact that thereâs no process in place to appeal a red is wild. Itâs tacitly saying the refs are infallible.
FIFA can deny all the appeals they want, whatever. But at least have the pathway for appeals there, if for no other reason than to not look like an utterly corrupt organization.
âŠ
7
→ More replies (2)4
u/Masheeko 14d ago
They do exist, just not in knock-out tournaments where referees from different associations gather, time windows are short, and the neutrality of panels would be easily questioned. Hence the non-appealable automatic ban, which everyone could accept, even if it has hurt multiple nations throughout the years.
In domestic leagues where there's more man-power and single decision point on how to call things and the time-frame to allow for a suspended sentence, appeals are quite common.
25
u/wangmeatexpress 14d ago
Messi did it, but worse -> not even a foul US player does it -> red card
Make it make sense
→ More replies (17)17
u/boot2skull USA 14d ago
When a U.S. player makes FIFA as much money as Messi, they will get plot armor.
16
18
u/Chester_A_Arthritis 14d ago
All Iâm arguing is that his ankle wasnât âalmost brokenâ
→ More replies (1)
9
9
u/BarryMcKockinner 14d ago
Extended? Wtf? How could this result in an *extended" world cup ban?
12
u/Zauberer-IMDB 14d ago
It's clickbait that is technically true based on reporting what the rule is, because the rule is one match mandatory suspension with FIFA having the option to extend. Obviously, they won't make a determination that extension is appropriate in this instance because it's not like he ran over and dropkicked someone with malice.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (4)7
11
21
u/GeneralTu 14d ago
Yet, you can intentionally lay out a player with a blind side block that endangers that playerâs head, neck, legs etc and the result is that player, once he gains consciousness, must sit on the sidelines for a full minute while your team plays down a man. The rules are arbitrarily and silly
21
19
u/Jelopuddinpop 14d ago
May I remind everyone that Muharemovic recieved a miracle of healing, because after 5 minutes of writhing on the ground, grasping at his ankle and everything else he could grab, screaming at the top of his lungs, and reaching his hands toward the heavens, he miraculously popped to his feet and played out the rest of the game (plus stoppage time) once Balogan got carded. I thought performances like that also get carded, no?
→ More replies (19)4
u/nirvroxx 14d ago
Performances like that get red carded if they clearly werenât hit but in this case , his ankle did get cleeted.
→ More replies (2)
âą
u/AutoModerator 14d ago
Thank you for your submission to r/worldcup. A general reminder to read the rules in the sidebar, treat your fellow fans with respect, and stay focused on the beautiful game.
Finally, take a closer look at this post regarding our civility rules and reddiquette because we would like for each and everyone to feel welcome on the subreddit and to keep a healthy and safe environment for the community.
Please also make sure to Join us on Discord
Thank you!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.