r/news • u/AudibleNod • 20h ago
White House teleprompter operator made more than $100K betting on Trump's speeches: Sources
https://abcnews.com/US/white-house-teleprompter-operator-made-100k-betting-trumps/story?id=1347645738.1k
u/Sharp-Calligrapher70 20h ago
…and yet, the lack of accountability from this administration (and government as a whole) continues.
1.6k
u/youarenut 20h ago
Not just the admin but the government and the people too. No one’s doing anything, just letting the elites slowly eliminate us
349
u/camshun7 20h ago
Its truly thee epitome of truth.
We ARE that patient lying on the hospital gurney, with the Japanese puffer fish poison in our blood, lying awake, during the autopsy.
Apologies to hammer house of horror
16
u/No-Aide-3028 15h ago
But we can move like a few of our fingers (voting in the midterms to change everything)
→ More replies (2)46
→ More replies (91)18
u/shinyappyrobin 19h ago
Are you saying the teleprompter guy is an "elitist"? I personally think it's kinda funny, and not really even sure it's illegal, online betting is such a new industry.
→ More replies (22)101
u/sleep_tite 19h ago
Shouldn’t Kalshi be able to sue Perez since he violated their TOS as a private citizen? I would think gambling sites would slam the hammer on people who win on insider knowledge and the gov shouldn’t be too involved even though the CFTC was already.
194
u/MurkyInvestigator810 19h ago
I thought insider trading was a point of pride and a feature for betting/gambling platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.
→ More replies (1)77
u/WhiteMorphious 17h ago
Their CEO literally argued it was a “truth machine” and people with insider knowledge “leveraging their knowledge” was a feature of that
8
50
u/qman621 18h ago edited 18h ago
Insider trading is the only way anyone makes any money on those apps
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)35
u/ADHDick_in_ur_mouth 18h ago
Why would they? They almost always make money on every bet. Kalshi did not bet against Perez. Kalshi created a platform to allow Perez to bet against other private citizens, and kalshi takes a cut of all of those transactions. This is oversimplified but basically how it works
→ More replies (1)4
u/yourethegoodthings 15h ago
They are not the house, is probably the most oversimplified way I can put it.
They built a house and let people stay there.
→ More replies (1)24
u/DazzlingRutabega 16h ago
Don't worry, didn't you read the part about:
"The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson...
🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣
"I'll uh, just check with the boys down at the Crime Lab. They uh, got uh, four more detectives working on the case. They've got us working in shifts."
→ More replies (1)69
u/JussiesTunaSub 18h ago
They did put him on unpaid leave already:
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/markets/trump-teleprompter-kalshi-bets-cftc-rcna587835
→ More replies (4)51
u/-MangoStarr- 17h ago
NOT fired though. Is he just going to come back when the smoke clears and continue doing w,e?
34
u/Different_Wolf_764 16h ago
Once the boss gets his tribute it will be fine.
7
u/BubbleGuttz 14h ago
“You gotta gimme a cut of this. Shit, I’d say the N-word on national television if it meant I’d get paid to say it.”
→ More replies (1)4
u/SummonerSausage 14h ago
He's going to bet on whether or not he's allowed to come back.
→ More replies (1)9
u/Radiant_History_9939 18h ago
yeah it feels like accountability is always promised but rarely shows up. people get tired of seeing the same pattern over and over.
→ More replies (16)4
u/travelinTxn 17h ago
When you see those at the top grifting why not get yours too. This is why we need people in power who hold up at the minimum the appearance of decency.
2.6k
u/ObviouslyJoking 20h ago
Isn’t this the expected experience if you allow unregulated gambling on things that people have influence over? I don’t even understand how it’s wrong to bet on a sure thing. Maybe just don’t make this kind of gambling legal at all.
1.1k
u/HauntingUpstairs7014 20h ago
No, no no... you don't understand. These are PREDICTION MARKETS.
261
u/orangeyougladiator 18h ago
They’re also regulated. <wink>
68
u/wizzard419 17h ago
Provided you give king daddy his cut, you're okay. Granted, you could give him $20 off a 50k win and just tell him it's 60%.
26
→ More replies (3)13
37
→ More replies (8)9
184
u/Electric_jungle 19h ago
It would need to be heavily regulated, but it also just makes no sense to have be legal at all. There's no way to moderate an endless number of bets effectively. Sports betting? Sure. Lot of problems there too but at least it's a controlled environment where regulation could go somewhere.
97
u/asdfghjkl15436 18h ago edited 18h ago
You can't regulate it. That's the point of a prediction market. If a big company in a normal stock market does something and you have insider knowledge, that's not necessarily indicative that the stock will go up or down, so at least there's some leeway. These prediction markets work on A/B - either it happens or it doesn't - and it's VERY easy to tilt it one way or the other without anybody having any idea.
This makes it especially dumb if you have things like "world leader dies" because it can lead into assassination markets. The whole thing is just dumb, dumb, dumb.
31
u/Electric_jungle 18h ago
That's kinda what I'm hinting at. Regulation is essential but if it's impossible to regulate, well, keep it to the black market where it belongs.
10
u/Snobolski 17h ago
You can't regulate it.
But if someone gives me a million-to-one odds, I'll put down a buck saying they'll eventually regulate it.
3
u/vowelqueue 16h ago
But how do I know you aren't the guy in the Trump administration that's about to announce the new Prediction Market Regulation Administration.
3
u/DaKrazie1 15h ago
Because no one in Trump's administration is gonna regulate something they can monetarily abuse. C'mon now.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Unable-Log-4870 17h ago
Eh, I’ve long preferred the more indirect version of just setting up a large legal defense fund for anyone charged with assassinating person XXXX, who is currently alive. And then advertising the existence of the legal defense fund.
73
u/OKOKFineFineFine 18h ago
Yeah, if you're calling it a prediction market, the whole point is to incentivize hidden information being used. This is exactly what's supposed to happen.
→ More replies (4)14
u/BrianWonderful 16h ago
The fact that most of the "predictions" are for things within the next day also kind of reveals the lie. What's the benefit of extremely short term predictions other than short term bets on them?
→ More replies (1)27
u/eeyore134 18h ago
He's not one of the chosen millionaires that are allowed to do it, though, so he might actually face consequences.
38
u/Kershiser22 18h ago
Anybody who is placing bets on easily manipulable outcomes are idiots. (Unless they are the ones doing the manipulating, of course.)
→ More replies (4)9
u/Unable-Log-4870 17h ago
This is my thought too. Why would you bet on this unless you either think you have inside information, or you KNOW you have inside information, or you have direct control over it?
Or I guess if you see the bets coming in, you could infer that someone else knows (or thinks they know) based on the bets, and then you could bet the same way.
→ More replies (3)9
u/ghostofwalsh 17h ago
Looking at it another way, the people betting against the teleprompter guy certainly have a choice not to bet.
It's not exactly rocket science to know that the contents of Trump's speech are known to some before he speaks the words.
→ More replies (1)5
u/RaymondLeggs 14h ago
I don't see wha the problem is, getting money every time he says "beautiful" "big" "Mutilization" "nasty woman" "nasty people" "sick people" "terrible people" "woke left" "hottest country" "best ever" because that's all he says.
3
u/theLuminescentlion 17h ago
This is the designed behavior. Prediction markets transfer money from idiots to people with insider information therefore making the information public.
→ More replies (12)3
3.0k
u/AudibleNod 20h ago
"The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle
No, they don't.
According to the sources, Kalshi alerted its regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), to the suspicious activity on its "Mentions" market, where users can bet on whether specific words, phrases or topics are uttered during a public speech.
See, that's when I'd go all 'Impractical Jokers' on Donnie and get him to say 'rutabaga' or 'Sasquatch'. Also, only $100,000? Spread that around and let your friends and family share in that love. Grandma needs a jetski.
644
u/MTFBinyou 20h ago
He can barely read. Guarantee it’s no higher than 3rd-4th grade level vocabulary. Rutabaga wouldn’t be said but some hilarious pronunciation would be. Doubt it’d be close enough to cash that bet out
306
u/ThunderheadStudio 20h ago
After watching that cretin stumble over "acetaminophen" before giving up, I'd absolutely pay someone to put in mildly uncommon or technical words for him to utterly fail at comprehending and pronouncing.
Just to cement what an incurious dunce he is.
Not that we need more evidence, but I enjoy it.
→ More replies (2)73
u/James-W-Tate 19h ago
Going forward I think presidential and congressional candidates should be forced to read a page or two from a few books at different reading levels. Maybe it would prevent us from getting some Donalds or Boeberts in the future.
Additionally I'd love to watch Donald attempt to do regular shit, like ride a bike or wash dishes.
65
u/Chastain86 18h ago
Going forward I think presidential and congressional candidates should be forced to read a page or two from a few books at different reading levels
It may seem like just yesterday that Katie Couric asked Sarah Palin to "name a newspaper" that she read, and she said "all of them," but that was 2008 and I guarandamntee you that political candidates haven't gotten smarter since then
56
u/James-W-Tate 18h ago
Man, I was so naive back then, thinking Sarah Palin was the floor for Republican stupidity. Simpler times.
24
u/StongaBologna 17h ago
Nah.
I remember asking some 'publican people I knew, "HAH! Look at this Palin character, what do you think of that??"
Thinking it was clearly obvious how full of shit, unqualified, and downright stupid she was.
The response I received was something like, "She's a badass, she hunts and kills stuff"
→ More replies (1)5
u/TheCheshireCody 12h ago
I remember thinking that back in 1988 when Dan Quayle couldn't spell "potato".
19
u/Sirwired 18h ago
And I remember how the GOP complained what a "gotcha" question that was.
12
u/Chastain86 17h ago edited 16h ago
A query that, in the words of Seth Meyers, could have also doubled as a Family Feud question.
5
u/rockytop24 17h ago
I was told she was too busy looking at Russia from her backyard to read papers.
3
u/fatbob42 17h ago
Appropriate because she was the beginning of the part of the process that allowed a literal idiot to be elected. The other parts started earlier but she was the pioneer of Presidential idiocy.
24
u/ThunderheadStudio 19h ago
They should be required to do comprehension reports on a few unbiased technical documents and a few cultural pieces, like poetry.
Not with like a pass/fail rubric, but with published results so you can get a read on how they think and what their strengths and weaknesses are.
I'd absolutely fucking love to read what this dipshit gets out of Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen.
15
u/Unique-Coffee5087 18h ago
Come on! Isn't it enough that he can identify a camel and draw a clock?
6
7
u/James-W-Tate 18h ago
Slow down bud, let's just make sure they can read first then we can move on to the more advanced stuff.
3
u/ThunderheadStudio 18h ago
I mean, submitting a response of "huh huh shtup nerd reeding iz dumb" would be acceptable.
We just deserve to know if that's what they think, or are capable of.
12
u/moosekin16 18h ago
He hatefully “imitated” a disabled reporter’s physical mannerisms. He falsely claimed immigrants were eating dogs. He stared directly at the sun (with no eye protection) during an eclipse. He has said “grab them by the pussy”. He has been found liable for damages for sexual assault / rape in a civil court.
You don’t need a test to know his thoughts. He’s made it abundantly clear already. His brain is racist soup.
3
u/DingerSinger2016 18h ago
I can thoroughly assure you the vast majority of Americans would not spend two seconds reading that report.
→ More replies (16)5
u/ContributionHead949 18h ago
can we throw in a ninja warrior and/or wipeout course run as well?
→ More replies (2)36
u/SpaceForceAwakens 19h ago
“Ruta… ruta… bag? Wait like a bagel? Rudy’s bagel? He’s not even Jewish.” - Trump, if this happened.
→ More replies (1)10
8
u/destro23 19h ago
some hilarious pronunciation would be
I am announcing a 1000% tariff to help protect our beautiful American made road toboggans...
4
u/mOdQuArK 18h ago
Change the prompter speech so that all the syllables are spelled out in what looks like short easy to pronounce words. Bonus is that it will make it more difficult for him to figure out what word he is actually saying.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)3
u/icepick314 19h ago
I was actually impressed by his pronunciation of hydroxychloroquine but that was from his first term.
87
138
u/BoogerFeast69 19h ago
The weird thing is that nobody in the press would blink anymore. You could get him to announce that our newest allies, the lizard-person race of Jupiter's 32nd moon, have agreed to assist in securing the Strait by using their space lasers to shoot down the very unfair terrorist drones.
After a moment of quiet contemplation he would probably just add "The lizard people...very cold hands...the coldest. BUT their lasers are HOT...like the hottest you've ever seen...you wouldn't believe how hot...not as hot as OURS though. We've got the best lasers of course..."
And in 24 hours we would have all forgotten.
63
u/uwu_mewtwo 19h ago
The headline: "In Primetime Speech, President Trump Takes a Hard Line on the Straight of Hormuz"
→ More replies (4)18
u/wallybinbaz 19h ago
I'm so tired of this take. There was an ABC report this morning about the two Senate hearings held this week and mentioned falsehoods by the current administration throughout. ABC, specifically, uses phrases like "false claims about the 2020 elections" and other corrective language when reporting on Trump all the time.
Fox News and Newsmax are not all of the media.
25
u/TittyMcFagerson 19h ago
This is not a problem constrained to just Fox and Newsmax, and if you haven't been paying attention to the endless sanewashing going on from every large media agency over the last decade then I don't know what to tell you. Life must be good under a rock.
9
u/wallybinbaz 19h ago
Watch various ABC programs every day. They call out his shit, pretty consistently.
21
u/TittyMcFagerson 19h ago
I mean ABC is probably one of the better ones, but still the language "false claims" is so weak. Do they ever call them what they are: lies?
5
u/wallybinbaz 18h ago
They've used lies before, I believe. You also have to look at how much the administration has worked to chill the freedom of the press. ABC's owned broadcast stations are forced to defend their licenses early in the 8-year cycle. The FCC is now moving to override the national cap on TV broadcast ownership on a case-by-case basis, meaning only companies that agree with us are getting deals done.
Colbert's cancellation. Kimmel's suspension.
The NYT has reporters subpoenaed for Air Force One/Qatar plane stories.
Have to be careful how you criticize this administration.
7
u/TittyMcFagerson 18h ago
You're absolutely right about all of that and I understand it has a significant impact on reporting standards. Truly dystopian times.
12
u/ContextBotSenpai 18h ago
So, in other words - the media, INCLUDING ABC, are all sane-washing him and this administration, because they're okay not reporting on actual fascism as long as the Trump admin is nice to them.
Have I got that right?
→ More replies (1)3
u/UnquestionabIe 18h ago
NPR can be pretty bad at times, both before and after Trump stole their funding. They'll have some dipshit on who will be very firmly a Trump lucky that they'll tiptoe around and then when the dumb shit eventually needs discussed will be as meek as possible about any pushback. Once in a long while you'll get someone who does challenge them but it's gotten more and more rare.
10
u/amusingduck 19h ago
is "if you do this, make sure the boss gets a cut" an ethical guideline?
3
u/Chastain86 18h ago
I believe in this administration, as with all criminal organizations, this is referred to as "the vig"
6
22
u/traderncc 19h ago edited 19h ago
Kalshi upset it lost money, rats on customer. are we surprised?
edit: ok Kalshi actually noticed unusual activity--someone is winning with consistency. hahahahaha
58
u/MurkyInvestigator810 19h ago
Kalshi can't lose money from bets. That's not how it works at all. They stake nothing, they pay nothing, they just take a percentage of all the money everyone else puts in and distributes winning bets.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (10)5
u/Any-Put-1992 18h ago
Fuck Kalshi and prediction markets. There’s only one winner and it’s the house.
3
u/punkasstubabitch 18h ago
There is not a single White House Staffer who follows any ethics guidelines.
→ More replies (19)3
247
u/JimmyTheJimJimson 20h ago
I really hope the next administration comes in and prosecuted everyone who broke the law during this term
188
u/shrewsbury1991 19h ago
Don't hold your breath
54
u/BLT_Special 19h ago
Seriously, all these assholes are getting pardons. Nobody is going to face any jail time.
22
→ More replies (5)5
u/bannedagainomg 17h ago
Maybe the worst one will be getting pardons but i doubt anyone will get prosecuted either way.
Unless something goes horribly wrong a democrat should win next election and i would be willing to bet they say "we have to put it behind us and just move forward" or something like that.
→ More replies (4)5
28
u/SerpentRoyalty 19h ago
We've been through this once. The next admin will do nothing due to decorum (corruption).
→ More replies (1)21
u/60k_Risk 19h ago
It should be a free presidential win for any candidate that can fund a campaign and run on the premise of fixing everything that went wrong from this administration.
- Instead of giving money back to corps for tariffs, stimulus checks
- Policies to lower grocery prices
- Charging and convicting Trump and his yes men for all of their crimes including crypto rug pulls, insider trading via platforms like Kalshi, insider trading on the stock market (Trumps entire family, close friends, and billionaire acquaintances)
- Charging and convicting government employees who knowingly went against the Epstein Transparency Act and knowingly withheld and redacted files that were supposed to be released in its entirety (Pam, Kash)
- Charging and convicting for misuse of tax payer dollars, eg partying and private flights for non business purposes (Kash, Pete, Vance looking at you guys)
These are NOT democratic talking points. These are not Republican talking points. These are guaranteed wins that the large majority of the country would vote for in a heart beat.
On top of that, a lot of first time voters feel duped for falling for Trump and republican propaganda. Even life long republican voters are pissed. People are eager for change.
The next election, if it happens, and happens fairly, will be the largest swing in recent history.
22
u/fratticus_maximus 19h ago
Sorry, best I can do is "I don't like that black lady's laugh. It would be much worse under Kamala/Clifton" or "this candidate doesn't satisfy 100% of what I want even though he/she satisfy 80-90%. I'm going to sit this election out and let neo Hitler win" or "both sides are the same!"
→ More replies (2)3
u/Ordinary-Egg-56 16h ago
vote for me!
if i was running for president i wouldn’t even be able to speak about a lot of the things i would do to correct this and punish all the people responsible because people would think it’s too extreme and because i would become a target of the right and they might actually try to kill me to prevent the retribution i have planned
10
u/TrainingObligation 18h ago
Best we can do is give them complete amnesty. You know, so the nation can start to heal
/s
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)7
u/Chastain86 18h ago
Just as sure as God made little green apples, you can count on two things -- Republicans will attempt to steal anything that's not nailed down, and Democrats will handwave away any attempts to hold them accountable in order to "help the country heal."
Fuck that shit.
547
u/backpackwayne 20h ago
Well he figures Trump does it, why can't he.
217
u/AudibleNod 20h ago
Because Trump didn't get his cut, that's why.
32
u/RhoOfFeh 20h ago
The capo di tutti capi always gets a piece or someone's gonna be sleeping with the fishes. Capiche?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (3)15
u/Rudraksh108 18h ago edited 13h ago
I find myself thinking, what is the actual point of these laws if for the first time they're being stress tested and completely fail.....clearly whatever regulations and guardrails we have, are too slow to act and/or completely ineffective.
The people in the White House are all looting it and they're all in on it. Even the friggin teleprompter kid is looting from this White House. It's insane how there's zero respect. To me, the White House and presidency has lost so much allure and importance. When the next normal president comes in after Trump/Vance, the White House won't hit the same. The executive branch and judicial branch are compromised as fuck.
→ More replies (1)
1.3k
u/jolly_hero 20h ago
Why are prediction markets legal. Zero benefit to society, only risk and daily examples of harm.
716
u/MesquiteEverywhere 20h ago
Because Donald Trump Jr. is involved with both Polymarket and Kalshi.
→ More replies (2)42
u/AwwwMangos 18h ago
He’s playing both sides, so that he always comes out on top
→ More replies (3)6
u/jimothee 18h ago
This doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about playing both sides to dispute it
171
118
u/Corronchilejano 20h ago
We are in the gambling era.
81
u/FloatnPuff 19h ago
Because opportunities for upward mobility are so limited that people's best option to get out of the mire is to gamble their futures and these companies exploit and gamify that hopelessness and addiction. It's a really sad state to be in.
→ More replies (3)23
u/plexxer 19h ago
I consider it from the opposite perspective - I tend to think that the liquidity is just so incredibly lopsided that these markets are just playthings to some people. Trust me, the same people creating these are the ones that would have sold slaves for the gladiator arenas if this were another time and place.
→ More replies (3)8
84
u/LuciusCypher 19h ago
Because it makes rich people rich. Not society, but rich people.
→ More replies (1)26
u/randomtask 19h ago
Because it’s a way for insiders with power or access to make money by fleecing rubes who don’t know better.
20
u/pushaper 19h ago
I know Bill Maher is not popular but a while ago he made an interesting musing that america has lost its mentality of merit and defaulted to one of luck. It is not an unfair idea imo.
6
u/1200____1200 18h ago
People have been gambling for a long time, this is nothing new
Betting on anything that can be easily manipulated, like the text in a speech, is an indicator of a gambling problem or general lack of an ability to think rationally
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)10
u/heyheyhey27 19h ago
Something I've heard a lot is that many people who use betting apps these days don't think it's a good investment; they just have THAT little hope in the system. Their best shot is a literal gamble.
4
u/UnquestionabIe 18h ago
My job involves a lot of gambling/lottery players and occasionally I'll probe a bit about why they spend so much. For probably 80% of them it's like you said, there is no hope within the usual means as there is always something waiting to bleed you dry at any given moment.
There are some who are well off and just gamble because they can afford to lose. Some of them are decent people but get some real assholes. One regular is this middle aged guy who used to own a bunch of local businesses but ended up in jail for a few years for various things (selling drugs, tax evasion, prostitution ring, and so forth) yet hasn't ever had to work again once he got out because he had enough stashed away in various places that the system couldn't touch.
3
u/mrguyorama 13h ago
Like everything a gambler says about their gambling, that's a lie, and cope.
They gamble because it's addictive.
"It's the only game in town" is also horseshit, exactly like it was 100 years ago when gambling was this big previously. We've literally already been through this bullshit. The mob fixed the World Series last time this happened.
The actual game that is in town and can fix things is to vote for progressive populists who will fix shit. Like we did with FDR
→ More replies (45)3
u/Toxyma 16h ago
i truly believe it is to actually get insider info on things. Think about it, if you can associate a real name for an account and that account takes a bet when they are in a position of confidential knowledge. you can, with almost complete certainty, trust they will be right.
Now what do they want that information for idk probably insider trading and shit on top of printing cash with their not-a-casino
61
u/def_indiff 20h ago
"The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle when contacted by ABC News. "The staffer in question is fully cooperating with the CFTC."
That’s the funniest thing I’ve read today.
49
u/SeeSeaEm 19h ago
John Oliver did a good segment on prediction markets.
For as long as its legal, I cant blame anyone.
John Oliver on prediction markets: ‘Betting on war is really dark’ | John Oliver | The Guardian
17
u/Siegfoult 18h ago
Good piece. People need to realize that prediction markets are just casinos except certain people have an easy time cheating. If you aren't a cheater, your likely gonna loose.
124
u/beerncheese69 20h ago
It genuinely amazes me that people willingly listen to that man speak
→ More replies (2)31
u/WaluigiIsTheRealHero 20h ago
It’s not necessarily willingly, Trump enjoys it more when it isn’t consensual.
22
12
u/NotThatHandsomePete 19h ago
He's "in talks with federal regulators to settle allegations"? This is not illegal? And he's still the teleprompter guy. Interesting to see what he's already bet on tonight's shit show.
18
8
u/anchorftw 17h ago
Leavitt said she spoke with President Trump about it, and he thought it was a "disgrace" and made the decision himself to put Perez on unpaid leave.
"The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle when contacted by ABC News.
How are they supposed to know it's not ok when they see everyone around them doing the same thing? Are these strict ethics guidelines in the room with us right now? lol
→ More replies (1)
14
7
7
u/e37d93eeb23335dc 17h ago
Put me on the jury. There is no way I would find him guilty when his boss is blatantly grifting so much more.
7
u/hellcheez 18h ago
only trump's family and close friends can make money off of him. thought that was known.
6
u/thefanciestcat 7h ago
Watch them throw a White House staffer under the bus to make a show of pretending they have ethical standards.
5
u/Alternative-Dot-884 20h ago
Ok when is someone going to sue these gaming companies for paying our rigged payouts?
6
u/a_bagofholding 19h ago
It's still a gamble...you never know if Trump can read the words.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Gwinntanamo 18h ago
“Regulators at the CFTC have expressed a willingness to settle with Perez, and have discussed terms with him that would require Perez to give back his profits and refrain from making similar trades, according to sources familiar with the ongoing discussions.”
So he has to give back his profits, and that’s the end of it? Sounds like a real deterrent…
5
u/Zarmazarma 8h ago
Wow, even the little-man is in on the grift. Truly the most corrupt administration in history, from top to bottom.
5
u/Evening-Ad-8218 19h ago
I gotta find a way to make money on this! Its simply too good!
→ More replies (1)
4
u/tooshpright 19h ago
If guilty yes he should be punished but frankly it's a drop in the bucket when you consider all the other grifts the leader has done.
4
4
u/TheFlimFlamFamMan 17h ago
“The White House has strict ethics guidelines”. lmfao.
Everything they do is a hilarious projection.
4
u/havereddit 17h ago
""The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle when contacted by ABC News."
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
4
u/TracerDX 15h ago
Teleprompter forgot he's not one of them. Only the rich get to game the system to get richer.
3
4
3
u/UMustBeNooHere 12h ago
"The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow," said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
4
4
u/Remarkable_Gain6430 7h ago
So this objectively hilarious event raises red flags but this administration doing insider trading for billionaires doesn’t even merit the twitch of an eyebrow. I salute that poor teleprompter guy.
4
u/dubbleplusgood 20h ago
Let that be a lesson to all you Trump lackeys. You get kicked out if you don't kick up to Trump.
7
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Equivalent-Resort-63 18h ago
“White House spokesperson Davis Ingle commented that "The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow." “
Found in The book of ‘Loosey-goosey ethic guidelines’ next to Mein Kampf on the bedside table of the orange goon.
3
u/WhattaCheapPop 18h ago
Not going to hate on the guy because I assume a teleprompter operator isn't making bank or anything, but such an unbelievably fucked system we've created where this is possible.
3
3
3
u/Noodle-Works 17h ago
Trump is totally betting on himself with Kalshi and Polymarket. There is no other reason to say "magnets" 43 times in a press conference.
oh that and the brain-melting dementia
3
u/Soft_Walrus_3605 17h ago
He's probably looking around at the blatant corruption and thinking "why not me, too?"
Then he soon learned no, that's only for the elites, not the peons.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/djm19 16h ago edited 16h ago
This just reeks of a culture where everyone is insider trading, insider betting, profiteering, bribing, getting their friends and family positions, contracts, etc.
And this isn't just a "teleprompter operator", hes deputy assistant to the president (one of the highest ranked positions in the WH). He makes $175K a year.
3
u/cointoss3 15h ago
> The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow
Hahahahahahahaha. Hahaha, yeah, got it
→ More replies (2)
3
u/morfraen 15h ago
Figures they'd start with the lowest paid employee instead of the ones responsible for the worst offenses.
3
3
u/CorellianDawn 14h ago
I love how when the lower class do it, there's headlines and hearings and arrests and fines, but the upper class do it and its Tuesday.
3
u/welsalex 14h ago
Of course someone who works for him in support of his endeavors has no problem with using that to their advantage through fraud. But no, all the supporters act like "victims".
3
u/SloaneWolfe 13h ago
We need to abolish all of these gambling companies. It's impossible for them to self-regulate all 'predictions' that had insider information.
3
u/iuseblenders 9h ago
The sitting president that has used his Office to gain $20 billion in personal profit thinks that some Poor schmuck that used his position to gain $100,000 is a disgrace.
. He’s probably just upset that he didn’t get more ill-gotten gains. He’s playing in the sandbox and Donald Trump owns the beach.
3
u/SnooMaps1910 9h ago
Don Jr,
Eric
Bessent
And How Many More Including Donny are doing far worse and will escape justice.
3
5
u/JFeth 19h ago
This is why prediction markets should be outlawed. People with insider info are making tons of money by cheating and the companies don't care as long as they get their cut.
5
u/shinkouhyou 17h ago
I work in clinical research. Today I got a LinkedIn notification saying that Kalshi will soon let you bet on the results of clinical trails, and I started thinking of all the ways that drug company employees, doctors, patients, clinical trial staff, study monitors, data analysts, safety board members, lawyers, consultants, FDA employees and others would be able to use insider info to bet (potentially compromising the study in the process). Most of these people would not be obviously linked to the company running the trial, and some would have access to data from a lot of different trials, so it would be hard to detect insider betting (especially if insider info were laundered through spouses or friends). A handful of fairly easy-to-trace people might have access to insider information about a Trump speech, but hundreds of difficult-to-trace people could have insider information regarding a clinical trial. Insider stock trading based on clinical trials is already an issue, but Kalshi would make it infinitely easier.
4
u/ToxicAdamm 19h ago
Victimless crime to me. People who bet on polymarket nonsense do not deserve sympathy.
5
u/BetaRebooter 17h ago
Who fucking cares, if a low paid teleprompter can take advantage of this fat fuck financially good on him
→ More replies (1)
1.2k
u/JK_NC 19h ago
Prediction markets are just a bunch of insiders and chumps.