Greece has emerged as one of the main opponents of a proposed European Union ban on the transportation of russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) to third countries, arguing that the measure would disproportionately damage Greek shipping interests and strand billions of dollars in specialised vessels.

Source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/edn-20260717-1

This is a video by the social team of the European Commission. We're trying this new thing where we make videos out of comments from social media.

Ukraine's Ministry of Defence has stated a critical shortage of PAC-2/PAC-3 interceptors — currently the primary countermeasure against the ballistic missile strikes hitting Kyiv and other cities on a near-nightly basis.
What I haven't seen properly investigated: reporting suggests the US and EU member states hold PAC-2/PAC-3 stockpiles sufficient to meaningfully close this gap. If that's accurate, this isn't a production or capacity shortage — it's a question of why existing stock isn't being transferred faster, and who's making that call.
That distinction matters a lot for how this should be covered and pressured politically. "We don't have enough" and "we have enough but haven't decided to send it" are very different stories, and right now most coverage seems to default to the first framing without much scrutiny.
A few open questions I think are worth digging into:
What's the actual current PAC-2/PAC-3 stock breakdown across NATO members, and how much is realistically transferable without compromising their own air defense posture?
Are there known bureaucratic or diplomatic bottlenecks in the transfer process (e.g. PURL mechanism, bilateral approvals) that explain the delay better than "no political will"?
Has any outlet done a real accountability piece tracing specific transfer decisions and who blocked or delayed them?
Not trying to push a conclusion here — genuinely think this is a story that needs someone with defense-procurement expertise to actually verify the numbers, rather than it staying at the level of advocacy statements.